Man, that would be the uber-cynical point of view of this whole thing, wouldn't it? Could Utah be doing this because the poors are unpleasant for the dapper and well-dressed denizens to look at when they hit the town for weekend family time?
That most certainly was not what I was saying or what I gleaned from Mark Twains writings. By addressing the issues one of the side effects is things are more pleasant for everyone. If you choose to believe that is the sole motivation behind offering this type of assistance that is an inference you will have to make on your own. I made no such observation.
I'm not really looking at it that way. I'm just pointing out it's probably the most cynical and pessimistic of rationales for this policy.
Honestly, I think it's entirely fiscal. I guess that's... kind of okay?
