Rank these maps from FiveThirtyEight by plausibility (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 19, 2024, 12:44:35 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  Rank these maps from FiveThirtyEight by plausibility (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Rank these maps from FiveThirtyEight by plausibility  (Read 2229 times)
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,849
United States


« on: August 19, 2012, 12:35:10 PM »

A -- basically a near-repeat of 2008. Arizona and Indiana are on the fringe of contention; Missouri and North Carolina will be close. That's if things revert to where they were before the Ryan bump when the novelty wears off.

B-- with a Romney collapse, although such a collapse would put Georgia, Texas, and some Mountain South states in play.

C -- with an Obama collapse for which time is running out.

A is much likelier than B, itself much more likely than C.  
Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,849
United States


« Reply #1 on: August 20, 2012, 08:31:27 AM »

I think people's best Romney scenarios are all fairly realistic, but the best Obama scenarios I think are unrealistic --especially whoever gave Obama the south. He's far more likely to carry western states before he grabs the south.

This map


Obama- 437
Romney- 101

assumes that President Obama can win back the five states that Clinton won twice but Obama got clobbered in -- Arkansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Tennessee, and West Virginia. President Obama is a poor match by culture to any of those states.  Projecting that the President would win Texas makes more sense (and not much!) than projecting any, let alone all, of the Clinton-but-not-Obama states that Democrats used to need to win. Carter (in 1976) and Clinton were the right sorts of Democrats to win those states -- Southern moderates or populists.  Texas is much more urban than any of the Clinton-but-not-Carter states.  Suburbs of Atlanta, Dallas, Houston, and San Antonio defied the national trend of 2008 and went for McCain; should they go for Obama as did suburbs of... let's say Denver or St. Louis... then President Obama wins Georgia and Texas.

President Obama has no connection to the upper "Mountain South", which also explains why he did badly in Missouri for a winning Democrat (the Ozarks are hard to distinguish culturally and politically from Appalachia). If he can get out the votes in greater St. Louis and Kansas City to an inordinate degree he wins Missouri.  Georgia is more ambiguous. Clinton won it only once.  Arizona? The Governor and the sheriff of the largest city have been the most effective right-wing demagogues since the late Senator Jesse Helms. Demagoguery usually collapses, but not as fast as its detractors wish. But it could.

Here is what I think a 437-101 split of electoral votes looks like:


Obama- 437
Romney- 101

That will require a Romney/Ryan collapse that I have not seen happen as verified in polls -- yet.

 
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.032 seconds with 11 queries.