One more thing SJoyce:
While this is a state office and not a federal seat he's running for, you would be one of the first to admit that Crist would have no qualms taking the anti-privacy, pro-war, and pro-drone policies that the hacks do now days.
You made one of the greatest threads in the history of this forum as to why Barack Obama didn't deserve your support in 2012. . .. what in the blue hell are you doing supporting a man who would no doubt be a statist control freak if he was put in the right position? If I saw this kind of inconsistent logic from posters like Lief I wouldn't be at all surprised, but from you? Really?
And before you respond "he's running for Governor, not Senator" I would point out that Charlie Crist attaining statewide office arguably puts him a step closer to federal office in the future. For me, that's too dangerous a scenario to consider support. And unlike Rick Scott, who will no doubt go down being remembered as one of the most horrible POS who ever governed a state, his becoming President is more of a certifiable reality. I'm not saying four more years of Rick Scott is preferable to four more years of Crist, but given how horrible Scott has been as Governor I don't see what the harm is in considering other candidates for office. The man barely won election in a Republican wave year (granted against a popular Democrat) Republicans haven't really shown yet that they are on track to repeat the wave in 2014.
So yes I will echo Dereich's statement:
What are you doing supporting such a creep?