Chavez: The U.S. will bite the dust

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

http://www.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/americas/08/09/chavez.invasion.ap/index.html

Just the most recent sample of Chavez's dementia. Hey BRTD, what do you say now? or would you like to be part of his revolutionary brigades?

Chavez is a bit out of his mind if he thinks the US is going to invade his ass!
Although I support his opinion on the matter, I at least, am smart enough as to not bad-mouth the military juggernaut! or behave like a child like A la Kim Jong Il

Uhh, we already had a coup against him. Good thing it was unsuccessful.

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

We'll bite the dust, eh?  You first, Hugo.

And we'd not have much trouble invading Venezuela if the army was not in Iraq.  The difficulty in Iraq comes from sectarianism, which does not exist in Venezuela, Islamism, which does not exist in Venezuela, and border states who back insurgents, which again do not exist in the Venezula example.

Most of the population is on the coast, and I'd assume most of the military too.  This means that we'd not have to deal much with the most difficult terrain to wage offensive war, which is in the interior.

Wait, sectarianism is the problem in Iraq? We've united the Shia and Sunnis against us. Maybe try some other talking point?

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

We'll bite the dust, eh? You first, Hugo.

And we'd not have much trouble invading Venezuela if the army was not in Iraq. The difficulty in Iraq comes from sectarianism, which does not exist in Venezuela, Islamism, which does not exist in Venezuela, and border states who back insurgents, which again do not exist in the Venezula example.

Most of the population is on the coast, and I'd assume most of the military too. This means that we'd not have to deal much with the most difficult terrain to wage offensive war, which is in the interior.

Wait, sectarianism is the problem in Iraq? We've united the Shia and Sunnis against us. Maybe try some other talking point?

Since when are the Shia and Sunnis united?  Only yesterday you were arguing the opposite, that whether an Iraqi sect voted or not determined its support for the US occupation, and then cited low Sunni turnout as evidence that the Sunnis disliked us, and by implication that we supported the Shia side.  Consistency, anyone?

OK, maybe they're not really best friends, but crazies everywhere believe that the enemy of my enemy is my friend, so they seem to be allied for the moment.