Does Tim Cahill's Decision to run as an Independent now Appear Clairvoyant? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 20, 2024, 08:38:26 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Gubernatorial/State Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Does Tim Cahill's Decision to run as an Independent now Appear Clairvoyant? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Does Tim Cahill's Decision to run as an Independent now Appear Clairvoyant?  (Read 1216 times)
Small Business Owner of Any Repute
Mr. Moderate
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,431
United States


WWW
« on: January 21, 2010, 01:49:17 PM »

You didn't need a crystal ball to know that Deval would be vulnerable, but there was nothing especially prescient about Cahill's switch. He's well aware that he'd be a slam dunk as the Democratic nominee, but he's similarly aware that ousting Deval in a Democratic primary would be a dicey proposition at best.

I don't know that the Brown/Coakley race shifted things much. Deval was in miserable shape before, and he's in miserable shape after.

The race could get interesting once it begins getting fired up. I honestly think Cahill has something of a glass jaw, and Democrats and Republicans alike may be interested at taking a few swings at it. Then again, Charlie Baker has the stink of a health care big wig on him, and that could be especially disastrous in 2010.

It upsets me that the worst possible option could win re-election because there were too many people interested in taking him down.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 10 queries.