SB 22-24: Global Advocacy and Voice Protection Act (Passed) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 19, 2024, 03:02:20 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  SB 22-24: Global Advocacy and Voice Protection Act (Passed) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: SB 22-24: Global Advocacy and Voice Protection Act (Passed)  (Read 1264 times)
Former President tack50
tack50
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,882
Spain


« on: February 26, 2020, 08:16:02 PM »

Guess I will sponsor
Logged
Former President tack50
tack50
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,882
Spain


« Reply #1 on: March 01, 2020, 07:44:59 PM »

Thank you Mr. Vice President. I will speak in support of this bill. As everyone in this chamber knows, there is a policy traditionally enacted by executive order known as the Mexico City Policy. This policy blocks NGOs from receiving federal funding if they speak to the people they are supporting about abortion. This is a policy that infringes on the rights of NGOs to operate in foreign countries.

Also I will note that much like in real life, this policy is routinely activated and repealed every time a new president takes office.

Right now the Mexico City policy is not in effect as it was repealed by president Adam Griffin through executive order GRIFF 002

Quote from: GRIFF-002
Executive Order 39-001 is hereby rescinded.
Executive Order 47-007 is hereby rescinded.
Executive Order 47-024 is hereby rescinded.

Before that it was reinstated by the tmthforu administration through executive order 47-007

Quote from: Executive Order 47-007
Executive Order
Implementation of the Mexico City Policy

The Mexico City Policy is hereby reinstated, effective March 1st, 2019.

X President Tmthforu94


Going back even further, the Mexico city policy was first instated by the Dfwlibertylover administration (with a sunset provision for the end of the administration). It was then repealed de facto by the short Goldwater administration (given President Goldwater never reissued a similar executive order). After that it was reinstated again by the fhtagn administration, again with a sunset provision; and repealed de facto by the NC Yankee administration as it never had an executive order reinstating it (Honestly that surprised me a lot, I would have expected Weatherboy to be the one to repeal it)

In any case, this bill will remove the power to repeal and reinstate the Mexico City policy from the hands of the executive and put it in the hands of Congress, which will mean a more consistent policy in that area.
Logged
Former President tack50
tack50
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,882
Spain


« Reply #2 on: March 06, 2020, 02:17:59 PM »

Why do you both think the Mexico city policy should be decided by the president? If anything this would bring more stability to our laws, instead of having 180 degree turns once another president comes in.
Logged
Former President tack50
tack50
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,882
Spain


« Reply #3 on: March 07, 2020, 09:02:02 AM »

Why do you both think the Mexico city policy should be decided by the president? If anything this would bring more stability to our laws, instead of having 180 degree turns once another president comes in.
Because this is a game and that seems like a simple and fun pet issue for the president to have reign on.

I mean, does it add that much more activity to have the next Federalist president issue an executive order repealing the Mexico City policy, then having the next Laborite president issue an executive order taking it back? Yes, both major parties are big tents on the issue of abortion but the correlation will be high anyways.

As Yankee said, it could be a decent enough campaign issue, but as Scott said, putting the policy in the hands of Congress allows for more debate and it still keeps it in the sphere of public debate.

In fact, if anything it will make it so the issue gets debated more, not less; given how we have midterms every 2 months but presidential elections only once every 4 months. The fact that recent House and especially Senate elections have been mostly uncontested doesn't mean they will be forever.
Logged
Former President tack50
tack50
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,882
Spain


« Reply #4 on: March 10, 2020, 03:02:01 PM »

Well 1.II is essencially most of the point of the bill. The amendment is unfriendly

This is the kind of issue that doesn't really lend itself too well to compromises but I will admit I am not 100% closed to them.

Also for what is worth a bipartisan bill would be even worse than a partisan Labor bill with regards to Yankee's point on debate and keeping more issues on the table of debatable issues.
Logged
Former President tack50
tack50
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,882
Spain


« Reply #5 on: March 15, 2020, 07:12:19 AM »

Nay
Logged
Former President tack50
tack50
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,882
Spain


« Reply #6 on: March 29, 2020, 07:02:50 PM »

Motion for a final vote.
Logged
Former President tack50
tack50
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,882
Spain


« Reply #7 on: April 02, 2020, 04:22:10 PM »

Aye
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 10 queries.