arkansas (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 17, 2024, 11:49:43 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results
  2008 U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  arkansas (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: arkansas  (Read 19580 times)
Meeker
meekermariner
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,164


« on: December 14, 2008, 06:40:59 PM »

Yea, Al's on the right track. Arkansas whites are no more or less racist than whites in other similar parts of the south.

If Obama had spent a crap load of money in Arkansas like he did in North Carolina and Virginia and to some extent Georgia he probably could've done a lot better. He chose not to, and thus did not do well there.

The Clintons being from there also probably cost him a 1-2% personal vote.
Logged
Meeker
meekermariner
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,164


« Reply #1 on: December 14, 2008, 08:53:51 PM »

Yea, Al's on the right track. Arkansas whites are no more or less racist than whites in other similar parts of the south.

If Obama had spent a crap load of money in Arkansas like he did in North Carolina and Virginia and to some extent Georgia he probably could've done a lot better. He chose not to, and thus did not do well there.

The Clintons being from there also probably cost him a 1-2% personal vote.

Hmm no. What you and Al are not looking at is how the white voters in NC and AR vote in elections. Lets take 2004 vs 2008..


AR: 2004: 63-36 vs. 2008: 68-30.

Then look at NC.

NC: 2004: 73-27 vs.  2008: 64-35



... which is completely ignorant of the growth in the Research Triangle, what the white vote is outside of that area, the amount of money Obama spent in various media markets, the personal Clinton vote, and so many other things.
Logged
Meeker
meekermariner
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,164


« Reply #2 on: December 14, 2008, 09:11:52 PM »

Yea, Al's on the right track. Arkansas whites are no more or less racist than whites in other similar parts of the south.

If Obama had spent a crap load of money in Arkansas like he did in North Carolina and Virginia and to some extent Georgia he probably could've done a lot better. He chose not to, and thus did not do well there.

The Clintons being from there also probably cost him a 1-2% personal vote.

Hmm no. What you and Al are not looking at is how the white voters in NC and AR vote in elections. Lets take 2004 vs 2008..


AR: 2004: 63-36 vs. 2008: 68-30.

Then look at NC.

NC: 2004: 73-27 vs.  2008: 64-35



... which is completely ignorant of the growth in the Research Triangle, what the white vote is outside of that area, the amount of money Obama spent in various media markets, the personal Clinton vote, and so many other things.

It not called the Research Triangle, its called the Triangle. Research Triangle Park is a research park inside the Triangle. Anyways, there are other large metro areas in NC then the Triangle. Like the Triad metro, Charottle metro, Asheville metro.

You've destroyed my argument.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.017 seconds with 11 queries.