On the other hand, I can spot many, many legislative provisions that will cost health-care costs to shoot the moon, the part about no discrimination in plans to people based on "health status" or exclusions based on "pre-existing condition" being the worst offender in my mind. (that I pointed out yesterday)
Furthermore, I sincerely doubt that any new proposal could create as much "access" to health care as there is presently, but that statement presumes "access" to health care is a positive thing. Any greater "access" to health care would inherently create "cost problems" much greater than the present system.
First of all how will the addition of a public option not create more access to health care?
Secondly what do you think people with pre-existing conditions should do? Should they just remain uninsured and then end up in the ER and cost society about $100,000 anyways?