Health care poll (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 09, 2024, 10:10:27 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Health care poll (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: In the most general terms, what do you think should be done about health care access and cost problems in the United States?
#1
Nothing should be done, the current system works well.
 
#2
There should be health insurance reform, correcting bad practices.
 
#3
Health insurance cooperatives should be created to increase competition.
 
#4
A government subsidized public insurance option should be created.
 
#5
The United States should adopt a single-payer system.
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 60

Author Topic: Health care poll  (Read 6228 times)
Sbane
sbane
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,313


« on: July 31, 2009, 05:32:51 AM »

I can't stand how much of a right wing echo chamber this forum is.  There are no liberals here!

I support a national mandate for states to strive towards universal coverage.  Of course now is not the time for that though.

Single payer health insurance is a common-sense, centrist policy throughout the rest of the industrialized world.

And the cancer rate is 5 times higher to boot.

Source?

http://www.ncpa.org/pub/ba649

I saw nothing about the cancer rate being 5 times higher in the rest of the industrialized world.
Logged
Sbane
sbane
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,313


« Reply #1 on: July 31, 2009, 05:43:57 AM »


On the other hand, I can spot many, many legislative provisions that will cost health-care costs to shoot the moon, the part about no discrimination in plans to people based on "health status" or exclusions based on "pre-existing condition" being the worst offender in my mind. (that I pointed out yesterday)
 
Furthermore, I sincerely doubt that any new proposal could create as much "access" to health care as there is presently, but that statement presumes "access" to health care is a positive thing.  Any greater "access" to health care would inherently create "cost problems" much greater than the present system.



First of all how will the addition of a public option not create more access to health care?

Secondly what do you think people with pre-existing conditions should do? Should they just remain uninsured and then end up in the ER and cost society about $100,000 anyways?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 13 queries.