democrats: with hindsight do you give old man Bush free pass in 1992? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 30, 2024, 10:55:00 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  democrats: with hindsight do you give old man Bush free pass in 1992? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: democrats: with hindsight do you give old man Bush free pass in 1992?  (Read 2560 times)
Mr.Phips
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,547


« on: March 18, 2011, 08:22:27 PM »

Maybe this results in a worse shellacking later. After all, 1994 was not an especially terrible economy, the underlying symptoms could have arisen later. Besides, where does it end? Are you going to give up on Presidential elections entirely in order to do better in Congress? Republicans already had three consecutive terms at that point, isn't it about time you made use of your majorities?


I would give up on Presidential elections in a second in order to hold onto Congress.  The Presidency is a weak and useless position to have. 
Logged
Mr.Phips
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,547


« Reply #1 on: March 18, 2011, 08:24:02 PM »

If we had let McCain beat Obama then we would have gigantic congressional majorities after 2010. Not sure if it would be worth it though.

We should have let McCain beat Obama.  I want to find Hank Paulson and bash his brains in for interfering in that election.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.017 seconds with 8 queries.