Canada under a US style presidential system (1867-present)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 20, 2024, 08:19:34 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs?
  Alternative Elections (Moderator: Dereich)
  Canada under a US style presidential system (1867-present)
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8
Author Topic: Canada under a US style presidential system (1867-present)  (Read 57368 times)
Hatman 🍁
EarlAW
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,018
Canada


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #125 on: September 19, 2010, 02:35:25 PM »

The Democratic Party had two candidates running for president. Governor Douglas was looking to run again, and he was competing against Congressman David Lewis of Ontario.



Meanwhile, the SoCreds could no longer work with each other, and the Quebec branch, led by Caouette walked out of the party and decided not to run for the Presidency, and instead concentrate on the House elections in Quebec. The now western based party acclaimed Thompson as their presidential candidate once again. He chose Alberta governor Ernest Manning as his VP candidate.

Logged
Hatman 🍁
EarlAW
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,018
Canada


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #126 on: September 19, 2010, 02:48:17 PM »

The first primaries to be held were in Nova Scotia and New Brunswick.

The amount of delegates are equivalent to the amount of EVs each province has. Each house district elects one delegate and the remainder would be to the candidate to win the province.

None of the candidates campaigned in either of the provinces, noting that Stanfield would win the both easily as a favourite son.

Nova Scotia
Stanfield - 89%
Diefenbaker - 2%
Roblin - 1%
Others - 8%

New Brunswick
Stanfield - 73%
Roblin - 17%
Diefenbaker - 3%
Others - 7%

Stanfield - 42 delegates
All others - 0 delegates


Meanwhile for the Democrats, Douglas would win both provinces - but Lewis picked up one delegate.

Douglas - 41
Lewis - 1
Logged
Hatman 🍁
EarlAW
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,018
Canada


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #127 on: September 19, 2010, 03:52:08 PM »

Manitoba's primary was a week later, and Governor Roblin was the favourite son there. Diefenabker did some some campaigning in rural Manitoba, and was able to secure one delegate.

Roblin 82%
Diefenbaker 7%
Hees 3%
Hamilton 3%
Others 5%

Meanwhile, Douglas won 18 delegates to 2 for Lewis.

British Columbia was a week later...

Senator Fulton had the obvious edge in the province, and despite getting a lower % of the vote than either Roblin or Stanfield did in their home provinces, he won all 28 delegates.

Fulton 74%
Roblin 7%
Diefenbaker 7%
Hees 5%
Hamilton 3%
Others 4%

Meanwhile for the Dem's Douglas won 27 delegates in BC to just one for Lewis.

And one week later was the small Prince Edward Island primary.

Stanfield 83%
Roblin 4%
Diefenbaker 2%
Hees 2%
Others 9%

Stanfield won all eight delegates.

After these 5 primaries, MacLean and Walker-Sawka dropped out of the race, having failed to win very many votes at all.

Douglas won all eight delegates in the PEI primary.

Totals after 5 primaries:

Stanfield: 50
Fulton: 28
Roblin: 19
Diefenbaker: 1


Douglas: 94
Lewis: 4
Logged
Hatman 🍁
EarlAW
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,018
Canada


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #128 on: September 19, 2010, 04:46:43 PM »
« Edited: September 19, 2010, 05:25:33 PM by Hatman »

The next week was the territorial primaries followed by the Prairie (AB & SK) primaries. Alberta would be the first real battle ground in the Conservative race, as no one was sure who would win.

For the record, both territories delegates went for Diefenbaker and Douglas respectively.

Saskatchewan:
Diefenbaker: 62% (18 delegates)
Hamilton: 21% (4 delegates)
Roblin: 13% (1 delegate)
Others: 4%

Douglas wins all 23 delegates

Alberta:
Fulton: 30% (14 delegates)
Diefenbaker: 28% (7 delegates)
Roblin: 17% (1 delegate)
Stanfield: 9%
Hees: 6%
Hamilton: 5% (1 delegate)
McCutcheon: 2%
Fleming: 1%
Starr: 1%

After doing more poorly in Saskatchewan than had hoped, Hamilton drops out and endorses Diefenbaker.

Douglas wins 22 of 23 delegates.

One week later is the Newfoundland primary, which Stanfield wins easily

Stanfield: 75% (13 delegates)
Hees: 12%
Roblin: 4%
Fulton: 4%
Diefenbaker: 2%
McCutcheon: 1%
Fleming: 1%
Starr <1%

Douglas wins all 13 delegates for the Democrats

Delegate totals so far:

Stanfield: 63
Fulton: 42
Diefenbaker: 28
Roblin: 21
Hamilton: 4 (dropped out)


Douglas: 148
Lewis: 5


Next week is super Monday! (Ontario and Quebec, where most of the delegates are)

Lewis is polling well in Ontario and Quebec, but he will have to exceed expectations to be able to knock of Douglas. Meanwhile, the Ontario candidates are hoping for their breakthrough in Ontario, but Ontarians can't make up their mind on who to back...
Logged
Hatman 🍁
EarlAW
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,018
Canada


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #129 on: September 19, 2010, 06:19:36 PM »

Super Monday! The final primaries in Quebec and Ontario.

Let's start with Quebec...

Diefenbaker lost pretty much all his support in Quebec since his defeat in '63.  Governor Roblin had been working hard at courting the Francophone vote, and promised Tories that if elected, he would bring Quebec back into play for them. Fulton did well as well, because he could speak French. Stanfield was popular with the English business class in Montreal, which secured him a handful of delegates.

Roblin: 34% (52 delegates)
Stanfield: 33% (19 delegates)
Fulton: 23% (28 delegates)
Hees: 5%
Others: 5%

Meanwhile, in the Democratic Primaries, Lewis wins 93 delegates to Douglas' 6.

And now for Ontario...

Hees - 28% 49 delegates
McCutcheon - 21% 23 delegates
Fleming - 20% 21 delegates
Diefenbaker - 11% 8 delegates
Roblin - 7% 5 delegates 
Stanfield - 6% 3 delegates
Starr - 5% 0 delegates
Fulton - 3% - 0 delegates

That makes the totals
Stanfield: 85
Roblin: 78
Fulton: 70
Hees: 49
Diefenbaker: 36
McCutcheon: 23
Fleming: 21
Hamilton: 4 (dropped out)

A very close race, which will ultimately go to the convention...

Meanwhile for the Dems, Lewis performed better then expected winning 79 delegates to Douglas' 30. That made the grand total of Douglas 184 and Lewis 177.  At the convention, Douglas picked Lewis to be his VP candidate.


Logged
Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario)
Vazdul
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,295
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #130 on: September 19, 2010, 07:31:35 PM »

Very interesting results in the Conservative primaries.
Logged
Hatman 🍁
EarlAW
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,018
Canada


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #131 on: September 19, 2010, 07:52:03 PM »

Smiley

1967 Conservative Party Convention!

It was anybody's guess who would win, and become the Presidential nominee for the Conservatives. Just prior to the convention, Wallace McCutcheon dropped out and endorsed Stanfield. Stanfield certainly had the momentum now, going in.

After President Diefenbaker gave an impassioned speech, the first round of balloting began...

Stanfield: 95
Roblin: 91
Fulton: 70
Hees: 49
Diefenbaker: 40
Fleming: 21

McCutcheon's endorsement was worthless, as slightly more than half of his delegates went to Roblin. After the first round, Fleming, Diefenbaker and Hees all dropped out. Hees and Fleming endorsed Stanfield while Diefenbaker endorsed Roblin.

Stanfield: 151
Roblin: 151
Fulton: 70

Round 2 had the candidates tied... Fulton endorsed Stanfield, and most of his delegates listened- barely

Stanfield: 189
Roblin: 184

Due to the closeness of the race, Stanfield quickly named Roblin as his VP nominee. And so we are set for the 1967 Presidential election Smiley
Logged
Hatman 🍁
EarlAW
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,018
Canada


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #132 on: September 19, 2010, 08:56:25 PM »

I should note that 1967 is Canada's centennial, and 1967 is the year of Expo '67 in Montreal. The 1967 was a great year for the country. Nationalism was at an all time peak, thanks to the centennial and its new flag. However it would be described as Canada's "last good year", as the foundations of separatism in Quebec were beginning to unfold. When French President Charles de Gaulle visited Expo 67, he told a large crowd "Vive le Quebec libre", to much applause.

Anyways, the 1967 election!



Stanfield was able to win the Maritimes, Alberta and Saskatchewan, but that was it. It was a good year for Canada, and they weren't turning their backs to President Pearson.

Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,277
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #133 on: September 19, 2010, 11:53:35 PM »

Very interesting. Nice idea. Smiley
Logged
Hatman 🍁
EarlAW
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,018
Canada


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #134 on: September 20, 2010, 08:14:34 PM »

House results

Liberals: 142
Conservatives: 85
Democrats: 22
Ralliement créditiste: 11 (Quebec splinter group of Social Credit) 
Social Credit: 2


Senate standings

Liberals: 31
Conservatives: 26
Social Credit: 12
UN: 11
Democrats: 4
Logged
Hatman 🍁
EarlAW
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,018
Canada


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #135 on: September 23, 2010, 09:56:23 AM »

In his previous term of office, President Pearson eliminated racial qualifications for immigration in Canada, merged the Canadian Armed forces and started a presidential commission on bilingualism and biculturalism. In his second term, he started the presidential commission on the status of women.  Pearson appointed a young Senator Pierre Trudeau to be Attorney General of Canada, and with him came some reforms on social liberalism. One of them was the legalization of homosexuality. This became a huge debate in Canada. It had the support of most Liberals and the Democrats (many Dems insisted it was an illness that should be treated, not condemned). For it to pass the Senate however, it needed the support of some Conservatives, as the UN and Social Credit was steadfast against it. While most Tories opposed, many Red Tory Senators in Ontario supported it, and it narrowly was approved, and Pearson signed the bill into law in 1968. The bill also legalized contraception, abortion and lotteries, put restrictions on gun ownership, authorized the breathalyser test, and relaxed divorce laws. Trudeau famously said "there's no place for the state in the bedrooms of the nation"
Logged
Hatman 🍁
EarlAW
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,018
Canada


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #136 on: September 23, 2010, 01:22:15 PM »

1969 House Results

Liberals: 155
Conservatives: 72
Democrats: 22
Ralliement créditiste: 14

The Liberals rode the wave of optimism and embraced the changes in social liberalism in the country.

However, that would all come to a crash in 1970...

Throughout the 1960s, the separatist movement was brewing in Quebec. The terrorist organization, "Front de libération du Québec" had been detonating bombs in English neighbourhoods in Montreal as well as a plethora of other kinds of domestic terrorism.

On October 5, 1970 members of the FLQ kidnap British Trade Commissioner James Cross.  Five days later, they kidnap provincial treasurer Pierre Laporte. Within days, an emergency cabinet meeting is held, and Pearson declares the evocation of the War Measures Act, suspending habeas corpus. The next day Laporte is murdered, and the FLQ threatens to murder Cross as well if their demands aren't met. The evocation of the war measures act is criticized by many in the Democratic Party, as well as by the new separatist Parti Quebecois which had elected members to the Provincial Assembly of Quebec for the first time in 1969. Arrests are made in November, and finally in December Cross is found and after a series of negotiations, his captors are sent to communist Cuba. More arrests are made later in the month.

Support for the War Measures Act was overwhelming across Canada, and even in Quebec. However, the tides of separatism in Quebec would not be quashed. What was a struggle involving violence would become a political struggle...
Logged
Hatman 🍁
EarlAW
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,018
Canada


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #137 on: September 23, 2010, 03:40:42 PM »
« Edited: September 24, 2010, 12:51:50 PM by Hatman »

In 1971, Pearson announced that he would not be running for re-election, and so all the major parties would be having primaries.

We'll start with the Liberal candidates for President


Vice President Jean Lesage of Quebec


Attorney General Pierre Trudeau of Quebec


Senator Paul Hellyer of Ontario


Senator Paul Martin, again (of Ontario)


Senator John Turner of Ontario


Senator John James Greene of Ontario


Senator Allan McEachen of Nova Scotia


Quebec Secretary of Health Eric Kierans

And Mayor Harold Lloyd Henderson was back (mayor of Portage La Prairie, Manitoba)
Logged
Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario)
Vazdul
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,295
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #138 on: September 23, 2010, 09:37:09 PM »

This is very good. Keep it coming!
Logged
Hatman 🍁
EarlAW
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,018
Canada


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #139 on: September 23, 2010, 11:44:58 PM »

Conservative candidates for the 1971 election



Governor Duff Roblin of Manitoba



Governor John Robarts of Ontario



Quebec Auditor General Claude Wagner (former Liberal)



Congressman Jack Horner of Alberta



Congressman Heward Grafftey of Quebec



Senator George Hees of Ontario
Logged
Hatman 🍁
EarlAW
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,018
Canada


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #140 on: September 24, 2010, 10:50:16 AM »

And the candidates for the Democrats, which are now a more organized party, ensuring more candidates for President.



Congressman David Lewis of Ontario


Economist James Laxer of Ontario



Professor John Paul Harney of Ontario


Congressman Ed Broadbent of Ontario


Congressman Frank Howard of British Columbia
Logged
Hatman 🍁
EarlAW
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,018
Canada


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #141 on: September 24, 2010, 11:12:58 AM »

Social Credit would finally re-unite by 1971, but was heavily influenced by its Quebec wing.

For candidates ran,

Congressman Réal Caouette of Quebec
Businessman Phil Cossette of Quebec
Surgeon Phil McGillivray of Ontario
Journalist Fernand Bouret of Quebec

Logged
Hatman 🍁
EarlAW
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,018
Canada


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #142 on: September 25, 2010, 11:30:27 AM »

As usual, the first primaries are in Nova Scotia and New Brunswick.

Out of all the parties, only one candidate is from Atlantic Canada, and that's Allan MacEachen from Nova Scotia.  The Liberals mostly campaign in New Brunswick and leave Nova Scotia for the other parties to campaign in.


Let's start with Nova Scotia...

Liberals

MacEachen - 88% (21 delegates)
Trudeau - 3%
Lesage - 3%
Others - 6%


Conservatives

With Governor Stanfield not running, much support was for his running mate, Duff Roblin

Roblin - 55% (20 delegates)
Wagner 19% (1 delegate)
Robarts 15%
Hees 5%
Horner 4%
Grafftey 2%


Democrats
It should be noted that the Democrats were very divided in 1971, as a splinter group known as the "Waffle" was created. The Waffle endorsed Democratic Socialism, and wanted the Democrats to move to the left. They endorsed Mr. Laxer. Laxer found some support in Cape Breton, securing 2 delegates.

Lewis 49% (18 delegates)
Laxer 23% (2 delegates)
Harney 16% (1 delegate)
Broadbent 9%
Howard 3%


The Socreds didn't have the membership in Atlantic Canada to warrant a primary. The local parties in both provinces endorsed Caouette.
Logged
Hatman 🍁
EarlAW
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,018
Canada


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #143 on: September 25, 2010, 12:58:16 PM »

New Brunswick


Liberals:
MacEachen 53% (17 delegates)
Lesage: 13% (2 delegates)
Trudeau: 12% (1 delegate)
Hellyer: 8%
Martin: 7%
Turner: 3%
Others: 4%

Conservatives:
Roblin: 34% (16 delegates)
Wagner: 32% (4 delegates)
Robarts: 26%
Hees: 3%
Grafftey 3%
Horner: 3%

(Grafftey drops out, and endorses Roblin)
 
Democrats:
Lewis: 35% (16 delegates)
Harney: 33% (4 delegates)
Laxer: 22%
Broadbent: 6%
Howard: 4%
Logged
Hatman 🍁
EarlAW
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,018
Canada


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #144 on: September 25, 2010, 06:46:59 PM »

Next up is Manitoba (19 delegates)

Liberals
Hellyer 43% (14 delegates)
Lesage: 22% (2 delegates)
Trudeau: 21% (2 delegates)
Henderson: 10% (1 delegate)
Martin: 1%
Turner: 1%
Greene: 1%
MacEachen: 1%
Kierans: <0%

Totals so far
MacEachen: 38
Hellyer: 14
Lesage: 4
Trudeau: 3
Henderson (dropped out): 1 


Kierans drops out, as does Henderson

Conservatives

Roblin: 82% (19 delegates)
Robarts: 11%
Wagner: 4%
Horner: 2%
Hees: 1%

Totals
Roblin: 55
Wagner: 5


Democrats
Lewis 49% (14 delegates)
Laxer: 23% (3 delegates)
Harney: 18% (2 delegates)
Howard: 7%
Broadbent: 3%

Totals:
Lewis: 48
Harney: 6
Laxer: 5


Logged
Hatman 🍁
EarlAW
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,018
Canada


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #145 on: September 25, 2010, 07:15:46 PM »

British Columbia (29 delegates)

Liberals:
Hellyer: 49% (24 delegates)
Trudeau: 23% (5 delegates)
Lesage: 18%
Turner: 6%
Martin: 2%
Greene: 1%
MacEachen: 1%

Totals so far
MacEachen: 38
Hellyer: 38
Trudeau: 8
Lesage: 4
Henderson (dropped out): 1


Conservatives
Horner: 31% (15 delegates)
Roblin: 27% (9 delegates)
Robarts: 24% (5 delegates)
Wagner: 14%
Hees: 6%

Hees drops out

Totals:
Roblin: 64
Horner: 15
Wagner: 5
Robarts: 5


Democrats

Howard: 59% (22 delegates)
Laxer: 24% (7 delegates)
Lewis: 13%
Broadbent: 3%
Harney: 1%

Totals:
Lewis: 48
Howard: 22
Laxer: 12
Harney: 6
Logged
Hash
Hashemite
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,410
Colombia


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #146 on: September 25, 2010, 07:22:52 PM »

Go Lesage!

Great stuff, btw. Though even more maps would be cool Grin
Logged
Hatman 🍁
EarlAW
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,018
Canada


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #147 on: September 25, 2010, 07:49:06 PM »

Go Lesage!

Great stuff, btw. Though even more maps would be cool Grin

I'll have more maps for more recent elections. I might have county maps beginning in the 80s Smiley
Logged
Hatman 🍁
EarlAW
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,018
Canada


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #148 on: September 25, 2010, 08:51:43 PM »

Prince Edward Island (8 delegates)

Liberals
MacEachen: 71% (8 delegates)
Lesage 13%
Trudeau 6%
Martin 5%
Turner 2%
Greene 2%

MacEachen: 46
Hellyer: 38
Trudeau: 8
Lesage: 4
Henderson (dropped out): 1



MacEachen will try and use this momentum to do well in the remaining provinces, but he will have to work hard, as he is barely polling anywhere except Ontario and Newfoundland. The rest of the candidates are campaigning hard in Ontario and Quebec where most of the delegates come from.

Conservatives
Roblin: 52% (7 delegates)
Wagner: 28% (1 delegate)
Robarts: 10%
Horner: 9%

Totals:
Roblin: 71
Horner: 15
Wagner: 6
Robarts: 5


Roblin may have the lead, but will have to campaign hard in Ontario and Quebec where he currently trails Robarts and Wagner respectively. Actually, most of the campaigning will be done in Quebec, as Robarts is excepted to win most delegates in Ontario.

Democrats:
Lewis: 62% (7 delegates)
Harney: 20% (1 delegate)
Laxer: 10%
Broadbent: 9%
Howard: 1%

Totals:
Lewis: 55
Howard: 22
Laxer: 12
Harney: 7


Howard's hoping for some delegates in Alberta and Saskatchewan to give him some momentum going into Ontario and Quebec, but it is looking bleak for him despite being in 2nd place. Broadbent is counting on Ontario to win all of his delegates. Laxer is committed to the end. Harney is expected to sweep Quebec, as he is the only Francophone candidate.
Logged
Hatman 🍁
EarlAW
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,018
Canada


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #149 on: September 25, 2010, 10:05:52 PM »

The Territories are next, but since they're only worth 2 delegates, I'll say who wins..

Lesage wins both delegates for the Liberals
Roblin wins both delegates for the Tories
Howard wins the Yukon and Lewis wins the NWT in the Democratic Primaries there.

OK, now for the Prairie primary!
Alberta is worth 25 delegates and Saskatchewan, 19

Saskatchewan:

Liberals
Hellyer 48% (18 delegates)
Lesage 29% (1 delegate)
Trudeau 12%
Martin 4%
Turner 4%
Greene 3%
MacEachen <1%

Conservatives
Roblin 40% (12 delegates)
Horner 36% (6 delegates)
Wagner 15% (1 delegate)
Robarts 9%

Democrats
Laxer 39% (14 delegates)
Lewis 29% (4 delegates)
Harney 16% (1 delegate)
Howard 10%
Broadbent 6%

Alberta

Liberals
Hellyer 63% (25 delegates)
Turner 14%
Greene 14%
MacEachen 4%
Martin 3%
Lesage 2%
Trudeau <1%


Conservatives
Horner 67% (25 delegates)
Roblin 15%
Robarts 12%
Wagner 5%

Democrats
Howard 38% (15 delegates)
Lewis 36% (9 delegates)
Laxer 16%  (1 delegate)
Broadbent 6%
Harney 3%

With three primaries left the totals are...

Liberals
Hellyer: 71
MacEachen: 46
Trudeau: 8
Lesage: 7
Henderson (dropped out): 1


Conservatives
Roblin: 85
Horner: 46
Wagner: 7
Robarts: 5


Democrats
Lewis: 69
Howard: 38
Laxer: 27
Harney: 8


Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.091 seconds with 12 queries.