Why should Paul be present? We all know he is going to vote against more funds anyway. Try harder.
You're missing the irony. He wanted the State Department to have more security, but he wants to lower the State Department's budget which is what provides said security.
And, again, Rand Paul is a clown because he buys into the Benghazi conspiracy theory. Obama was an anti-war Senator once too, but he didn't accuse Bush of being involved in 9/11.
Terrible analogy and you know it.
You're right. It's an insult to 9/11 Truthers.
At least with the 9/11 conspiracy I can coherently state what the theory is: the government staged the hijackings of the planes and controlled demolished the buildings to create a national security emergency for the purpose of allowing them to escalate the government's power of policing and funding for the military industrial complex. It's insane, but
I understand what it is.Almost three years in and I still have no idea what the gripes with Benghazi are; it just seems to be a bunch of chirping of "what happened? we don't know!"