McConnell: No more circuit court nominees confirmed
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 16, 2024, 10:02:17 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  McConnell: No more circuit court nominees confirmed
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]
Author Topic: McConnell: No more circuit court nominees confirmed  (Read 3244 times)
Ebsy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,001
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: June 06, 2015, 02:20:29 AM »

I guess all those judges that Republican Senators signed off on aren't balance enough for the great CountryClassSF.
Logged
Skill and Chance
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,738
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: June 06, 2015, 03:22:32 AM »

So from now on, you have to control the senate to get any high level judicial nominees confirmed at all?

No, the Democrats will bend over backwards for the next Republican President, again.

The next time we have a Republican president, there won't be enough Dem senators in states he/she won to matter anymore.  From 2000-2008 you had Dem senators in 60% Bush states, so it's 100% understandable that they were less partisan than Republicans currently are.  This goes both ways.  If a Democrat gets 60% in CO and NV in 2020, you can bet Gardner and Heller will vote for 2/3rds of his/her nominees.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,811


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: June 06, 2015, 03:41:55 AM »

So from now on, you have to control the senate to get any high level judicial nominees confirmed at all?

No, the Democrats will bend over backwards for the next Republican President, again.

The next time we have a Republican president, there won't be enough Dem senators in states he/she won to matter anymore.  From 2000-2008 you had Dem senators in 60% Bush states, so it's 100% understandable that they were less partisan than Republicans currently are.  This goes both ways.  If a Democrat gets 60% in CO and NV in 2020, you can bet Gardner and Heller will vote for 2/3rds of his/her nominees.


Good thing the Democratic Senators from 60% D states like Joe Lieberman always stood up to Bush.
Logged
Skill and Chance
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,738
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: June 06, 2015, 04:03:32 AM »

This should be the wake up call for those here who think Hillary would be able to do anything  favorable to the left with the Kennedy or Scalia SCOTUS seats unless Dems control the senate and are willing to kill the SCOTUS filibuster for all time and risk a future Justice Cruz.

Regarding Lieberman and CT, didn't Graham vote for Kagan and Sotomayor?  SC has been R since 1976.
Logged
Landslide Lyndon
px75
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,986
Greece


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: June 06, 2015, 06:47:24 AM »

Regarding Lieberman and CT, didn't Graham vote for Kagan and Sotomayor?  SC has been R since 1976.

Lugar and Murkowski also voted for both, IIRC.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 9 queries.