The “Who is running in 2020?” tea leaves thread, Part 3
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 22, 2024, 03:09:37 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2020 U.S. Presidential Election (Moderators: Likely Voter, YE)
  The “Who is running in 2020?” tea leaves thread, Part 3
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 39 40 41 42 43 [44] 45 46 47 48 49 ... 80
Author Topic: The “Who is running in 2020?” tea leaves thread, Part 3  (Read 174293 times)
Harlow
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 625


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1075 on: January 15, 2019, 09:21:41 PM »


What a strange quote to end on.

"[...] You have done all this very much out of the spotlight."
*cut to campaign logo*

Like, okay...
Logged
JG
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,146


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1076 on: January 15, 2019, 09:56:59 PM »


It actually is. But unfortunately, it focuses on things that too few care about anymore-accomplishments and policy.
Logged
Shadows
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,956
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1077 on: January 15, 2019, 10:42:54 PM »

She highlights how she has opposed the most Trump nominees like if it was a game & showed that she was progressive. She opposed all these guys with a planned pitch that she was most opposed to Trump.

Who really talks about opposing President X's Cabinet Nominees as some kind of crowning achievement ?

And she has like 400 views. That is just terrible & pitiful !
Logged
Jon Tester
Rookie
**
Posts: 75


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1078 on: January 16, 2019, 12:21:09 AM »

Is it just me or is Sherrod's Dignity Of Work branding really on point?
Logged
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,066
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1079 on: January 16, 2019, 12:53:29 AM »

With the pace of news picking up, stuff is slipping through the cracks.  This story from last week slipped my attention, but here it is:

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/01/11/wall-street-hears-from-democratic-governors-considering-2020-runs.html

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Meanwhile, there’s a long Buttigieg profile here:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/magazine/wp/2019/01/14/feature/could-pete-buttigieg-become-the-first-millennial-president/?utm_term=.919a5ffa68fa

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Also:

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,066
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1080 on: January 16, 2019, 10:04:56 AM »

Klobuchar’s family on board with a run:

https://www.nbcnews.com/card/2020-roundup-klobuchar-inching-closer-bid-n958826

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

A followup on Brown’s road trip: He clarifies here that his ultimate decision on a run won’t happen until March:

https://www.npr.org/2019/01/16/676604096/ohio-sen-sherrod-brown-moves-closer-to-launching-2020-campaign

We now have quite a few candidates with a “March” decision timeframe (sometimes framed as “by the end of the first quarter”): Brown, Garcetti, Hickenlooper, McAuliffe, and Merkley are all giving this timeframe.  Maybe some/most will announce at the very end of the month to try to maximize their 2nd quarter fundraising number (which is what Warren did for the 1st quarter).
Logged
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,066
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1081 on: January 16, 2019, 11:09:42 AM »

Moulton headed to New Hampshire on Feb. 2nd:

https://www.bostonglobe.com/news/politics/2019/01/16/rep-moulton-speak-restarting-buzz-may-run-for-president/1Q7hZFR33aZ1ttXVFMQfJN/story.html

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
Shadows
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,956
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1082 on: January 16, 2019, 12:29:01 PM »

Brown Sanders Warren is going to be a very left wing group. You add how left people like Booker Harris Gillibrand have moved, the primaries will look completely different ideologically & policy wise than in 2016.
Logged
Grassroots
Grassr00ts
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,740
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 2.09

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1083 on: January 16, 2019, 02:34:38 PM »

She highlights how she has opposed the most Trump nominees like if it was a game & showed that she was progressive. She opposed all these guys with a planned pitch that she was most opposed to Trump.

Who really talks about opposing President X's Cabinet Nominees as some kind of crowning achievement ?

And she has like 400 views. That is just terrible & pitiful !

Facts, rocky start for her.
Logged
The Free North
CTRattlesnake
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,569
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1084 on: January 16, 2019, 05:07:14 PM »

She highlights how she has opposed the most Trump nominees like if it was a game & showed that she was progressive. She opposed all these guys with a planned pitch that she was most opposed to Trump.

Who really talks about opposing President X's Cabinet Nominees as some kind of crowning achievement ?

And she has like 400 views. That is just terrible & pitiful !

Facts, rocky start for her.

She's going nowhere so it really doesnt matter.
Logged
Former Crackhead Mike Lindell
Randall
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,461
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1085 on: January 16, 2019, 06:27:44 PM »

She highlights how she has opposed the most Trump nominees like if it was a game & showed that she was progressive. She opposed all these guys with a planned pitch that she was most opposed to Trump.

She was the lone Senator to vote against confirming James Mattis. It was 99-1. And why? Pathetic points scoring.
Logged
Dr Oz Lost Party!
PittsburghSteel
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,033
United States


P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1086 on: January 16, 2019, 06:31:44 PM »

She highlights how she has opposed the most Trump nominees like if it was a game & showed that she was progressive. She opposed all these guys with a planned pitch that she was most opposed to Trump.

She was the lone Senator to vote against confirming James Mattis. It was 99-1. And why? Pathetic points scoring.

She voted against him because the military should be citizen-led. A very appropriate decision.
Logged
Dr Oz Lost Party!
PittsburghSteel
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,033
United States


P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1087 on: January 16, 2019, 06:32:17 PM »

She highlights how she has opposed the most Trump nominees like if it was a game & showed that she was progressive. She opposed all these guys with a planned pitch that she was most opposed to Trump.

Who really talks about opposing President X's Cabinet Nominees as some kind of crowning achievement ?

And she has like 400 views. That is just terrible & pitiful !

Facts, rocky start for her.

She's going nowhere so it really doesnt matter.

I mean, we were all saying this about Trump, but Atlas never learns.
Logged
Sherrod Brown Shill
NerdFighter40351
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 716
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1088 on: January 16, 2019, 06:50:03 PM »

Hmmmmmmmmm. https://dignityofwork.com

This might as well be a campaign site. It's also worth pointing out that the top picture there of Brown is the same picture at the top of the Draft Brown website.

ALL HAIL SHERRGOD.
Logged
Progressive Pessimist
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 33,724
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.71, S: -7.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1089 on: January 16, 2019, 07:45:28 PM »

Brown Sanders Warren is going to be a very left wing group. You add how left people like Booker Harris Gillibrand have moved, the primaries will look completely different ideologically & policy wise than in 2016.

And that's saying a lot because 2016 really didn't have that much of a substance-based contrast between Clinton and Sanders, contrary to popular belief.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,830


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1090 on: January 16, 2019, 07:51:28 PM »

Brown Sanders Warren is going to be a very left wing group. You add how left people like Booker Harris Gillibrand have moved, the primaries will look completely different ideologically & policy wise than in 2016.

And that's saying a lot because 2016 really didn't have that much of a substance-based contrast between Clinton and Sanders, contrary to popular belief.

Bernie did his best to keep it about the issues. But Hillary people avoided the issues, except for gun control, which was suddenly the most important issue ever since Bernie had a D- rather than an F from the NRA.
Logged
History505
Guest
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1091 on: January 16, 2019, 07:54:16 PM »

Is Holder still considering? Haven't read much about him making any moves lately.
Logged
bilaps
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,789
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1092 on: January 16, 2019, 08:07:28 PM »

Brown Sanders Warren is going to be a very left wing group. You add how left people like Booker Harris Gillibrand have moved, the primaries will look completely different ideologically & policy wise than in 2016.

And that's saying a lot because 2016 really didn't have that much of a substance-based contrast between Clinton and Sanders, contrary to popular belief.

Bernie did his best to keep it about the issues. But Hillary people avoided the issues, except for gun control, which was suddenly the most important issue ever since Bernie had a D- rather than an F from the NRA.

Also, there wasn't contrast if you believe HRC. But, you know thrustworthiness is not her top quality. I mean you could beleive her that she went to the big banks to tell them to knock it off or that she's against the TPP but in reality there were people who saw her as a phony which she was.
Logged
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,066
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1093 on: January 16, 2019, 08:43:13 PM »


Update on this:

https://boston.cbslocal.com/2019/01/16/seth-moulton-2020-presidential-election/

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
Dr Oz Lost Party!
PittsburghSteel
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,033
United States


P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1094 on: January 16, 2019, 09:03:58 PM »

I wanna know what is going on in Seth Moulton's mind that tells him that running for President is a good idea, let alone what even makes him think he even stands a chance winning the nomination after his attempted coup against Pelosi fell flat?
Logged
Sherrod Brown Shill
NerdFighter40351
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 716
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1095 on: January 16, 2019, 09:54:23 PM »

Theory: Tim Ryan was planning on running, but now that it seems Brown will run, he is shying away from it, leaving Moulton (good friend/ally of Ryan) out in the rain with only one option; run a campaign that nobody wants.
Logged
Rookie Yinzer
RFKFan68
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,188
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1096 on: January 16, 2019, 10:13:44 PM »

I wanna know what is going on in Seth Moulton's mind that tells him that running for President is a good idea, let alone what even makes him think he even stands a chance winning the nomination after his attempted coup against Pelosi fell flat?
I was imagining Eric Swalwell's face in my head until I typed his name in on Google. He really needs to sit down.
Logged
LabourJersey
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,219
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1097 on: January 16, 2019, 10:47:44 PM »

I wanna know what is going on in Seth Moulton's mind that tells him that running for President is a good idea, let alone what even makes him think he even stands a chance winning the nomination after his attempted coup against Pelosi fell flat?

Based on what I've read about the guy he's insanely arrogant and probably convinced he should and will become President, way more so than even the typical ambitious politician
Logged
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,066
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1098 on: January 17, 2019, 01:23:09 AM »

Booker and others doing early primary state talent recruiting:

https://www.sacbee.com/news/politics-government/election/article224616140.html

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

O’Rourke is “not yet assembling a campaign team”, and yet his advisers are plotting his hypothetical campaign:

https://www.politico.com/story/2019/01/16/orourke-advisers-2020-plans-1105967

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

The story also repeats what Politico also reported last week: That four people who have spoken to O'Rourke or his advisers say he’s leaning towards running.

Finally, Bullock’s in no rush to announce, and may well wait until after the Montana legislative session ends at the end of April:

https://www.sfgate.com/news/article/Montana-s-Bullock-in-no-rush-to-announce-plans-13538990.php

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
Askew
Rookie
**
Posts: 54


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1099 on: January 17, 2019, 02:35:09 AM »



Having worked with Liz before this is an amazing hire.
How are anyone remotely related to the Clinton clusterf**k even remotely hirable?

Yeah, you'd think the Hillary staffers would be pariahs after their  up in 2016. It's one thing to lose a race, but Hillary was supposed to win in a landslide and due in large part to her campaign's laziness and mismanagement they didn't.

If Biden hasn't started staffing up yet, he's going to struggle to get top talent. I am not sure there are enough top talent staffers for all the candidates running and the longer you wait the more likely you end up with Robby Mook as your Campaign Manager.

And Brown is just an absolute no. We need that Senate seat and he doesn't bring enough to the table to make giving that up worth it especially with his domestic abuse issues in the past.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 39 40 41 42 43 [44] 45 46 47 48 49 ... 80  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.097 seconds with 11 queries.