MW Judiciary Amendment (Passed) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 22, 2024, 01:39:57 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government
  Regional Governments (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  MW Judiciary Amendment (Passed) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: MW Judiciary Amendment (Passed)  (Read 821 times)
Lumine
LumineVonReuental
Moderator
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,717
« on: December 03, 2013, 03:16:49 PM »
I pushed for something similar back when Maxwell had some ideas to reform the Constitution. I would really like to have a Chief Judicial offices, but do we have anyone willing to take the position? If so, this has my full support. If not, I would prefer to wait until someone's available.

And, as a minor detail, is there a chance we could change the name to something exotic? Grand Inquisitor is a name I would really like to see used in an office.
Logged
Lumine
LumineVonReuental
Moderator
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,717
« Reply #1 on: December 03, 2013, 08:16:43 PM »
Mr. Senator, Mr. Archduke, would you mind contacting your potential nominees to check if they would be interested in holding the position just to be sure we have candidates?
Logged
Lumine
LumineVonReuental
Moderator
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,717
« Reply #2 on: December 07, 2013, 12:03:34 AM »
« Edited: December 07, 2013, 12:46:22 PM by Midwest Governor Lumine »
Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

While we keep discussing this, I'll fix some minor issues with grammar.
Logged
Lumine
LumineVonReuental
Moderator
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,717
« Reply #3 on: December 07, 2013, 09:21:01 PM »
Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

How about this? It is more specific about the Althing vote...
Logged
Lumine
LumineVonReuental
Moderator
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,717
« Reply #4 on: December 07, 2013, 09:46:25 PM »
Quote from: GAworth on December 07, 2013, 09:40:40 PM
I like it, but unanimous makes me nervous

Nervous? Why? I think it's better that way for we are forced to achieve consensus. Otherwise you get a 2-1 vote, which (I believe) is not always fair.
Logged
Lumine
LumineVonReuental
Moderator
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,717
« Reply #5 on: December 07, 2013, 10:52:47 PM »
Quote from: GAworth on December 07, 2013, 10:41:42 PM
True, but if we get a, how do I put this, not so great, obstructionist, NMAMesque person. It could make things difficult.


Hmmmmmm... Good point, we certainly don't want gridlock. Cris? Arturo?
Logged
Lumine
LumineVonReuental
Moderator
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,717
« Reply #6 on: December 11, 2013, 11:43:42 AM »
Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

How about this?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 11 queries.