Why did Bush do so horrifically in MO in 1992? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 22, 2024, 12:00:10 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Why did Bush do so horrifically in MO in 1992? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why did Bush do so horrifically in MO in 1992?  (Read 1565 times)
darklordoftech
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,489
United States


« on: September 07, 2019, 07:18:13 PM »


The Farm crisis also hammered the state before that.

The 1980's GOP was really centered on making life better for the suburbs with lower taxes and indirectly cheaper commodities. The latter made life hell for farming, mining and extraction focused states leaving them as essentially "left behind" by the 1980's economy, which then got even worse when the whole economy went into recession.

As long as things were good though, Republicans did well in the suburban based states. Once that changed though, the Republicans had a problem in 1992 and Bill Clinton was able to appeal to both rural dissatisfaction and the suburbs.


However, wouldn’t Reagan’s and HW’s views on guns and abortion have helped them with rural voters?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.017 seconds with 12 queries.