Cisneros: Castro only option for Hillary (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 18, 2024, 03:32:44 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Cisneros: Castro only option for Hillary (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Cisneros: Castro only option for Hillary  (Read 3582 times)
Ebsy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,001
United States


« on: May 17, 2015, 02:35:55 PM »

I don't see what the problem is. San Antonio is the size of a small state, and he moved on to a Cabinet position.
Wasn't Mayor of San Antonio basically a part-time job, with the majority of the power in the hands of the City Council and the City Manager?
Yes, San Antonio is a weak mayoral system.
Logged
Ebsy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,001
United States


« Reply #1 on: May 17, 2015, 02:40:11 PM »

Well, the Governor of Texas is also a weak position, and yet no one complained about Bush's qualifications...
Mayors serving in weak mayoral systems can still be strong, if they are adept politicians and can elect their supporters to the city council/board of aldermen. It's incorrect to assume that just because Castro was in a weak system that he didn't run San Antonio in reality.
Logged
Ebsy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,001
United States


« Reply #2 on: May 17, 2015, 05:30:51 PM »

Honestly think Tom Perez would be a better pick than Castro.
Castro is both younger and more attractive than Perez.
Logged
Ebsy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,001
United States


« Reply #3 on: May 19, 2015, 01:23:37 PM »

If it's looking like a pretty competitive race, the safer choice would be to pick Kaine in order to help lock down Virginia. If a joke Republican candidate wins (decent chance), and if it's looking like a relatively easy race for her, she should go with Castro to jumpstart the "new wave of young Democratic leaders of tomorrow."
What I don't understand is why Kaine and not Warner. Wasn't Kaine the guy in charge of the D-triple C during the 2010 rout? Why is he an attractive VP pick other than his home state? I would much rather have Warner if we were picking Senators from Virginia.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 11 queries.