Bernanke's worst nightmare: Ron Paul
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 14, 2024, 08:54:07 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Economics (Moderator: Torie)
  Bernanke's worst nightmare: Ron Paul
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Bernanke's worst nightmare: Ron Paul  (Read 1868 times)
Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl
Libertas
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,899
Finland


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: November 15, 2010, 03:45:40 PM »

Bernanke's worst nightmare: Ron Paul
Ron Paul will have Congressional Federal Reserve oversight

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Grin
Logged
Gustaf
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,779


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -0.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: November 15, 2010, 03:57:39 PM »

Letting politicians run monetary policy has worked out so great in the past that this is a great development.
Logged
Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
Moderators
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 54,118
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: November 15, 2010, 06:59:52 PM »

I saw that on wikipedia the other day, and I laughed my head off when I saw he was ranking member on that subcommittee. Oh, those hearings are going to be interesting.
Logged
Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl
Libertas
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,899
Finland


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: November 15, 2010, 08:23:10 PM »

Letting politicians run monetary policy has worked out so great in the past that this is a great development.

Letting banksters run monetary policy has worked out so great, it's only given us a few minor busts like the Great Depression and the Crash of 08.
Logged
Frink
Lafayette53
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 703
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.39, S: -6.17

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: November 15, 2010, 08:36:58 PM »

This will certainly be an interesting circus to watch.
Logged
CatoMinor
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,007
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: November 15, 2010, 11:36:24 PM »

Cheesy
Logged
opebo
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 47,009


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: November 16, 2010, 05:29:24 AM »

Au contraire, libertas, it always helps a responsible moderate to have crazies attacking him, and thus by reaction increasing his support among sanes.

The classic example is the '72 Nixon landslide, but it applies to lesser public figures than president as well.
Logged
Gustaf
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,779


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -0.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: November 16, 2010, 01:52:09 PM »

Letting politicians run monetary policy has worked out so great in the past that this is a great development.

Letting banksters run monetary policy has worked out so great, it's only given us a few minor busts like the Great Depression and the Crash of 08.

Lol. You don't really know what running monetary policy is, do you?

Why don't you read up on the concept of independent central banks? Wikipedia might be a good place to start: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_bank
Logged
Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl
Libertas
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,899
Finland


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: November 16, 2010, 02:01:40 PM »

Au contraire, libertas, it always helps a responsible moderate to have crazies attacking him, and thus by reaction increasing his support among sanes.

The classic example is the '72 Nixon landslide, but it applies to lesser public figures than president as well.

Ah, so you're a Nixon '72 man too, not surprised.

But LOL @ Tricky Dick being a "responsible moderate".

Letting politicians run monetary policy has worked out so great in the past that this is a great development.

Letting banksters run monetary policy has worked out so great, it's only given us a few minor busts like the Great Depression and the Crash of 08.

Lol. You don't really know what running monetary policy is, do you?

Why don't you read up on the concept of independent central banks? Wikipedia might be a good place to start: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_bank

Yes, I am well aware of how such criminal operations are run. From your comments I have to conclude that it is you who needs to read up on the issue of monetary policy.
Logged
opebo
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 47,009


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: November 16, 2010, 02:24:13 PM »

Au contraire, libertas, it always helps a responsible moderate to have crazies attacking him, and thus by reaction increasing his support among sanes.

The classic example is the '72 Nixon landslide, but it applies to lesser public figures than president as well.

Ah, so you're a Nixon '72 man too, not surprised.

But LOL @ Tricky Dick being a "responsible moderate".

No, nothing about my post suggested that I view Nixon favorably - I was just using that as an example.  The hippies, war protesters, and other left-leaning movements at the time were viewed as 'extreme' by the middle of the electorate, and it made the rather right-leaning Nixon seem 'responsible' by comparison. 


Logged
ag
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,828


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: November 16, 2010, 02:29:07 PM »

Bernanke is smart enough so that it wouldn't even be very amusing to watch, I am afraid Smiley)

But, in truth, though, this might be a reason to reconsider keeping my savings in dollars. Euro has just gotten to be more attractive as a store of value.
Logged
Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl
Libertas
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,899
Finland


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: November 16, 2010, 02:30:40 PM »

Au contraire, libertas, it always helps a responsible moderate to have crazies attacking him, and thus by reaction increasing his support among sanes.

The classic example is the '72 Nixon landslide, but it applies to lesser public figures than president as well.

Ah, so you're a Nixon '72 man too, not surprised.

But LOL @ Tricky Dick being a "responsible moderate".

No, nothing about my post suggested that I view Nixon favorably - I was just using that as an example.  The hippies, war protesters, and other left-leaning movements at the time were viewed as 'extreme' by the middle of the electorate, and it made the rather right-leaning Nixon seem 'responsible' by comparison. 

Whoops, too late, your real views accidentally slipped out. You consider George McGovern a "crazy" and Richard Nixon a "responsible moderate".

So much for your "left-wing radical" act.
Logged
Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl
Libertas
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,899
Finland


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: November 16, 2010, 02:33:06 PM »

Bernanke is smart enough so that it wouldn't even be very amusing to watch, I am afraid Smiley)

Yes, Bernanke's a genius, just look at the economic stability and prosperity he has created as Fed chairman.


Bernanke's gotten owned by Paul before, and I know he's not looking forward to having to deal with him more often.
Logged
Earth
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,548


Political Matrix
E: -9.61, S: -9.83

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: November 16, 2010, 02:48:52 PM »

Letting politicians run monetary policy has worked out so great in the past that this is a great development.

Considering QE2 is just as political as it is an economic plan, they'll screw up some more, and then it's back to business.
Logged
Beet
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,964


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: November 16, 2010, 02:57:57 PM »

Letting politicians run monetary policy has worked out so great in the past that this is a great development.

Considering QE2 is just as political as it is an economic plan, they'll screw up some more, and then it's back to business.

What's your evidence that it's political? Even after QE2, current monetary policy is hardly loose, because the Taylor rule says interest rates should be deeply negative. (Had the Fed followed the Taylor rule in 01-03, the housing bubble would have been much more subdued if at all).

It seems to me they went out of their way to wait until after the election.
Logged
Gustaf
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,779


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -0.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: November 16, 2010, 03:16:39 PM »

Au contraire, libertas, it always helps a responsible moderate to have crazies attacking him, and thus by reaction increasing his support among sanes.

The classic example is the '72 Nixon landslide, but it applies to lesser public figures than president as well.

Ah, so you're a Nixon '72 man too, not surprised.

But LOL @ Tricky Dick being a "responsible moderate".

Letting politicians run monetary policy has worked out so great in the past that this is a great development.

Letting banksters run monetary policy has worked out so great, it's only given us a few minor busts like the Great Depression and the Crash of 08.

Lol. You don't really know what running monetary policy is, do you?

Why don't you read up on the concept of independent central banks? Wikipedia might be a good place to start: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_bank

Yes, I am well aware of how such criminal operations are run. From your comments I have to conclude that it is you who needs to read up on the issue of monetary policy.

Always with the playground taunts. See, monetary policy wasn't run by "banksters" when the Great Depression hit. Central banks were not independent and their was no monetary policy in the modern sense, because currency devaluations and inflation was not allowed.
Logged
Gustaf
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,779


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -0.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: November 16, 2010, 03:18:31 PM »

Letting politicians run monetary policy has worked out so great in the past that this is a great development.

Considering QE2 is just as political as it is an economic plan, they'll screw up some more, and then it's back to business.

I'm not totally following.
Logged
ag
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,828


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: November 16, 2010, 04:16:58 PM »

I know he's not looking forward to having to deal with him more often.


I don't think any sane person would be looking forward to that Smiley)
Logged
Oswald Acted Alone, You Kook
The Obamanation
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,853
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: November 16, 2010, 04:55:09 PM »
« Edited: November 16, 2010, 08:11:11 PM by John Fitzgerald Sexgod Kennedy »

Au contraire, libertas, it always helps a responsible moderate to have crazies attacking him, and thus by reaction increasing his support among sanes.

The classic example is the '72 Nixon landslide, but it applies to lesser public figures than president as well.

Ah, so you're a Nixon '72 man too, not surprised.

But LOL @ Tricky Dick being a "responsible moderate".

No, nothing about my post suggested that I view Johnson favorably - I was just using that as an example.  The warmongers and other right-leaning movements at the time were viewed as 'extreme' by the middle of the electorate, and it made the rather left-leaning Johnson seem 'responsible' by comparison.  

Just wanted to see what that looked like.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.234 seconds with 12 queries.