Are we being invaded by girls?

[President of the great nation of 🏳️‍⚧️]

So how many more girls do we need now to get close to 50%? Only a couple thousand or so, right?

Mathematically speaking, if the next 4,533 members are girls, then we'll have at least, but likely slightly more than, 50%. This is, of course, assuming these twelve:

CrabCake, TexasGurl, Evergreen. Virginia, Peebs and pho,

MisSkeptic, , Kushontas, Ghost_Whites, Penelope, and Madeleine

are the only Atlas girls.
UPDATE: Out of those who listed their gender, 5.41% are female. If this ratio were to hold up for all members, including those without a gender listed, then the male:female ratio is 4301:246. So we only need at least 4055, should this ratio hold up.

[President of the great nation of 🏳️‍⚧️]

A considerable number of women on Atlas are actually Trans. Not to denigrate their female identity or anything. I just liked the one comment (can't remember by whom) that on Atlas even a majority of women have penises.

Here is a question:  How many posters on this forum do we have that are biologically women?

I know Virginia is, but I don't know about anybody else.

[President of the great nation of 🏳️‍⚧️]

lol at this obsessive documenting of female users. Atlas gonna Atlas. We're even keeping a running total of the status of their genitals now!

It's Atlas, so any influx of girls, regardless of our Nixons or lack thereof, is technically an invasion.

[President of the great nation of 🏳️‍⚧️]

It's very characteristic for this forum that this simple thread was quickly turned into a discussion who's a "real" woman and who's a "woman in name only".

TexasGurl is economically female while Virginia is socially female.

I know this is a joke, but is it bad that I'm interested in the definitions of economically and socially female?