Map based on predicted winning % by state

Wisconsin+17
Ben Kenobi
Junior Chimp

Posts: 6,134

Show only this user's posts in this thread

Re: Map based on predicted winning % by state

« Reply #25 on: August 16, 2016, 08:29:24 PM »

Quote from: yeah_93 on August 16, 2016, 05:30:03 PM

This map sucks.

Logged

Fmr President & Senator Polnut
polnut
Atlas Icon

Posts: 19,489

Political Matrix
E: -2.71, S: -5.22

Re: Map based on predicted winning % by state

« Reply #26 on: August 16, 2016, 08:40:02 PM »

OMG is he actually using Unskewed 2.0?

Logged

Hammy
Atlas Icon

Posts: 11,702

Re: Map based on predicted winning % by state

« Reply #27 on: August 16, 2016, 09:07:03 PM »

Quote from: Fmr President & Senator Polnut on August 16, 2016, 08:40:02 PM

OMG is he actually using Unskewed 2.0?

What's worse is using 1988 as a comparison in the opposite manner that they can be applied to this race--Dukakis (campaign competency-wise) was the Trump of 1988, not Bush.

Logged

RINO Tom
Atlas Icon

Posts: 17,050

Political Matrix
E: 2.45, S: -0.52

Re: Map based on predicted winning % by state

« Reply #28 on: August 16, 2016, 09:38:32 PM »

Quote from: Committeeman Kingpoleon on August 16, 2016, 07:27:04 PM

Quote from: Tilden's Tea Party on August 16, 2016, 04:16:04 PM

Quote from: Devout Centrist on August 16, 2016, 04:14:09 PM

Yeah I'd like a whole lot of clarification, pls.

What's that.

I was tempted to give my own definition*, but here's Google's:
1. the action of making a statement or situation less confused and more comprehensible

*My definition would have been: explaining and simplifying any phrase or sentence

LOL, I appreciate this joke, and now I'm going to go watch Airplane! Wink

Logged

Pages: 1 [2]

« previous next »

	Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email? May 14, 2024, 05:46:17 PM

News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more