are primaries bad for prez politics? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 11, 2024, 09:23:18 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  are primaries bad for prez politics? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: are primaries bad for prez politics?  (Read 2716 times)
dougrhess
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 442


« on: June 22, 2005, 09:32:20 AM »

Are primaries bad for choosing the best prez candidate? Some writers say they are bad for party strength. When did the primary system last undergo an overhaul?
Logged
dougrhess
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 442


« Reply #1 on: June 22, 2005, 11:19:56 AM »


From 1824-1912 the Conventions simply chose the nominee. The first major primary battle was the GOP Primary of 1912. There TR won all bu[t] 3 primaries, but Taft won at the Convetion. So primaries were not so strong.


So what did the primaries in 1912 do that TR's win didn't secure anything? Were they just like polls but w/o delegate selection?
Logged
dougrhess
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 442


« Reply #2 on: June 29, 2005, 09:19:07 AM »

The problem with putting primaries, or many of them, all on one day is that the nation is so freaking huge that people need time to get a chance to see or hear the various candidates a couple times. I like the idea of having several primaries scattered around the nation held on one day and then rotating each term what states are on what days.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.018 seconds with 11 queries.