FL: Opinion Savvy- Clinton +4 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 06, 2024, 09:45:34 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  FL: Opinion Savvy- Clinton +4 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: FL: Opinion Savvy- Clinton +4  (Read 2036 times)
Terry the Fat Shark
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,502
United States


P P
« on: November 03, 2016, 11:15:41 AM »


It's right there, folks.  Republican Cubans are swinging to Clinton.  
So....You make fun of the A- WMUR poll, but the C- Opinion Savvy poll must be right....right?
Logged
Terry the Fat Shark
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,502
United States


P P
« Reply #1 on: November 03, 2016, 11:41:48 AM »


It's right there, folks.  Republican Cubans are swinging to Clinton.  
So....You make fun of the A- WMUR poll, but the C- Opinion Savvy poll must be right....right?

I don't care what dopey hack Nate Silver has to say about pollsters and their quality.  I've got far too much experience to be swayed by whatever nonsense models he is coming up with to get clicks.
You sound like a Romney 2012 supporter....
Logged
Terry the Fat Shark
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,502
United States


P P
« Reply #2 on: November 03, 2016, 11:45:06 AM »


It's right there, folks.  Republican Cubans are swinging to Clinton.  
So....You make fun of the A- WMUR poll, but the C- Opinion Savvy poll must be right....right?

I don't care what dopey hack Nate Silver has to say about pollsters and their quality.  I've got far too much experience to be swayed by whatever nonsense models he is coming up with to get clicks.
You sound like a Romney 2012 supporter....

How?  All he did was average polls in 2012.  Now he's playing around with unskewing them and other nonsense and assigning house effects based on almost nothing.  He's clearly jumped the shark.  I've moved onto Nate Cohn who clearly has a clue.
Romney 2012 supporters (including myself, hate to admit) dismissed Silver in 2012 for showing an "unrealistic" outcome and thought the race was much closer, in this case I assume you think Clinton leads by a lot more than 538 does
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.022 seconds with 12 queries.