Public Discussion on the Supreme Court Cases (Avoid Cluttering Case Threads) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 07, 2024, 08:07:18 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  Public Discussion on the Supreme Court Cases (Avoid Cluttering Case Threads) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Public Discussion on the Supreme Court Cases (Avoid Cluttering Case Threads)  (Read 71085 times)
Blair
Blair2015
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,870
United Kingdom


« on: February 25, 2017, 06:21:01 PM »

FWIW the entire system is rather confusing, something I found out was...  if a non-Southern citizen is suing the South then it goes to the Supreme Court, but if it's a Southern Citizen it goes to the regional Judge
Logged
Blair
Blair2015
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,870
United Kingdom


« Reply #1 on: December 26, 2019, 07:00:46 AM »

I actually like the cases that challenge law- the vast majority of cases have been election disputes and it's always a nice change of pace to have non-process cases
Logged
Blair
Blair2015
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,870
United Kingdom


« Reply #2 on: April 15, 2020, 06:02:39 AM »

It always was stupid to have standing in my view & was extremely easy to get around; I believe in the past BaconKing (or perhaps someone else) simply said they were an Attorney for a women denied an abortion- as this is a simulation who other than the GM could stop that?

Logged
Blair
Blair2015
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,870
United Kingdom


« Reply #3 on: April 15, 2020, 12:08:02 PM »

Has the opinion on the Lincoln case been written? I know there will be less fireworks with it though!
Logged
Blair
Blair2015
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,870
United Kingdom


« Reply #4 on: April 21, 2020, 10:26:13 AM »

Yeah in every other election case the plantiff had to demonstrate how the ballots were incorrectly counted or disgarded- you can't just stand up and say 'the count is wrong' and then expect the Justices to work on it.

Quote
I also believe that certain established procedures regarding elections were, in this case, not followed.  As such, I hereby request the granting of a Writ of Certiorari, specifically concerning if the above election was properly certified, and if further review of the tally or a runoff election is warranted.

This is jibberish. What procedures? Why is a run-off relevant?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.035 seconds with 12 queries.