House Benghazi Report Finds No New Evidence of Wrongdoing by Hillary Clinton

[IceSpear]

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/29/us/politics/hillary-clinton-benghazi.html

You must be logged in to read this quote.

Yet another faux scandal goes up in smoke...how many times does this need to happen before the media and Hillary haters stop taking the bait?

[IceSpear]

I was waiting for henster to post that.

No, henster is Charlie Brown. We're Lucy.

[IceSpear]

Oh please. The New York Times is a terribly biased DNC rag. There were plenty of new revelations about Hillary! that night, including that Obama more or less gave the green light about intervening, but the folks at State and DoD were too busy dickering over whether the military should be wearing fatigues or civilian clothing.

And that part where Hillary basically LIED about the film causing the incident when she knew it was RADICAL MUSLIM TERRORISTS that were doing it all along.

Give me a break.

The New York Times are the ones that created the email story you guys love so much. So how can you square that circle?

[IceSpear]

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/29/us/politics/hillary-clinton-benghazi.html

You must be logged in to read this quote.

Yet another faux scandal goes up in smoke...how many times does this need to happen before the media and Hillary haters stop taking the bait?

Ah IceSper, but we, Hillary haters need only be right once. You and your Snow Queen, on the other hand, must dodge all bullets coming your way.

Good thing she's been dodging every bullet since the 90s then.

If I didn't know any better, I'd say she has some type of futuristic bullet deflector implanted in her body.

[IceSpear]

Oh please. The New York Times is a terribly biased DNC rag. There were plenty of new revelations about Hillary! that night, including that Obama more or less gave the green light about intervening, but the folks at State and DoD were too busy dickering over whether the military should be wearing fatigues or civilian clothing.

And that part where Hillary basically LIED about the film causing the incident when she knew it was RADICAL MUSLIM TERRORISTS that were doing it all along.

Give me a break.

The New York Times are the ones that created the email story you guys love so much. So how can you square that circle?

Tipping off the messenger from a friendly paper as opposed to one that is not friendly and is going to skewer you first is NEVER something that happens on both sides of the aisle in politics (/sarcasm).

If the media was in the tank for Hillary as you claim, they would've just ignored or given scant coverage to the email story. Instead they spammed it relentlessly for a year.

[IceSpear]

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/29/us/politics/hillary-clinton-benghazi.html

You must be logged in to read this quote.

Yet another faux scandal goes up in smoke...how many times does this need to happen before the media and Hillary haters stop taking the bait?

Ah IceSper, but we, Hillary haters need only be right once. You and your Snow Queen, on the other hand, must dodge all bullets coming your way.

Thing is, even if you are right once, it's going to look exactly the same as all the fake scandals you made up and would be just as easy for Hillary to dodge.

Indeed. Hillary would've been hurt a lot more by the email story if it wasn't for the other 20+ faux scandals that preceded it making most people tune out. She could probably commit mass murder at this point and most people currently supporting her would write it off as a right wing conspiracy. The GOP has no concept of "overplaying your hand."