is the reasons why the Indiana republicans didn't go overly aggressive (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 18, 2024, 07:35:15 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  is the reasons why the Indiana republicans didn't go overly aggressive (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: is the reasons why the Indiana republicans didn't go overly aggressive  (Read 2184 times)
jimrtex
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,817
Marshall Islands


« on: June 13, 2011, 09:24:43 AM »

The guv decided to leave with his reputation in place as kind of a non partisan policy wonk or something. I can't get too annoyed with that, although unilateral disarmament is typically unwise - but not always.
I think it was a lot smarter than it appears.  First it makes what looks like an east-west split of La Porte, but then reaches out and grabs Michigan City.  La Porte is more Democratic than Porter, and they grabbed the most Democratic parts.  They gave 4 districts suburbs of Indianapolis, and then they drew three districts across southern Indiana, which means they go further north and less of a Democratic lean, and stick Bloomington between suburban Indianapolis and suburban Louisville.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.022 seconds with 10 queries.