Should non-traditional forms of intercourse be prohibited? (user search)

	Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email? May 21, 2024, 09:10:25 AM

News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

Talk Elections

General Politics

Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)

Should non-traditional forms of intercourse be prohibited? (search mode)

Pages: [1]

Poll

Question:

Oral, etc.; even for married heterosexual couples

#1 Yes (Arrived in time machine from ~1700)		17 (18.1%)
#2 No (21st Century Resident of the Western World)		60 (63.8%)
#3 Yes (I just want to troll vote yes)		17 (18.1%)

Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 94

Author

Topic: Should non-traditional forms of intercourse be prohibited? (Read 2883 times)

True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend

Posts: 42,144

Re: Should non-traditional forms of intercourse be prohibited?

« on: January 30, 2016, 12:01:22 AM »

Yes. Who needs the internet or even the telephone or telegraph. Similiarly, no planes, trains, or automobiles. Let us go back to the traditional non-electronic and non-mechanical means of intercourse.

Logged

True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend

Posts: 42,144

Re: Should non-traditional forms of intercourse be prohibited?

« Reply #1 on: January 30, 2016, 08:52:15 AM »

Quote from: Torie on January 30, 2016, 08:41:30 AM

This would cause me to have a lot of extra time on my hands.

At your age, you could use more time. 😏

Logged

Pages: [1]

Jump to:

Page created in 0.022 seconds with 14 queries.