NV-RGJ: Clinton +1

[Antonio the Sixth]

Anyone who uses the term "statistical tie" has absolutely no understanding of statistics.

[Antonio the Sixth]

Instead of 50 posters launching an attack against me for writing "tie" into a heading, you guys should seriously wonder why Hillary's hyped lead has all but disappeared again within a matter of days in a crucial swing state (which Obama won by 7 and 14) ...

You should provided titles that accurately represent the poll's results. Stop acting like a moron.

[Antonio the Sixth]

Have they polled the Senate race too?

[Antonio the Sixth]

Have they polled the Senate race too?

The article says it's a "developing story" so I assume they'll post their Senate numbers soon enough. I'm sure it won't be too favorable for CCM, but I'm still quite optimistic that all the undecideds will break to the Democrats and the far superior GOTV efforts of the Clinton campaign will carry her to victory.

Yeah, this will probably have CCM trailing, but it won't be too bad if she's not trailing my too much. What matters is the difference between her and Hillary. The Suffolk poll was terrible, not because of the Senate numbers themselves, but because Hillary was up 6.

[Antonio the Sixth]

Jon Ralston tweeted that this poll probably overestimates GOP numbers and underestimates Latino turnout

Excellent! Now all we need is this poll not to show Heck leading by too much... *knocks on wood*