Anti-science views in the left (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 15, 2024, 10:26:28 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  Anti-science views in the left (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Anti-science views in the left  (Read 2527 times)
darklordoftech
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,477
United States


« on: September 09, 2017, 01:16:32 PM »

The big difference is that the Democratic Party is willing to say no to the anti-science left while the GOP indulges the anti-science right.
Logged
darklordoftech
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,477
United States


« Reply #1 on: September 09, 2017, 11:20:44 PM »

Seems like anti-circumcision hysteria is more common on the Left.
That's generally a matter of morals and not of science.
Logged
darklordoftech
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,477
United States


« Reply #2 on: September 14, 2017, 03:31:26 PM »



The ultra-authoritarian far left, i.e. Mao and Stalin, were quite anti-science.


Ultra-authoritarians of all sorts tend to be very selective when it comes to facts. For example, if "science" supported eugenics, Hitler would embrace it, but if science rejected eugenics, Hitler would say that the study was funded by Jews.
Logged
darklordoftech
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,477
United States


« Reply #3 on: September 14, 2017, 05:29:50 PM »

Most people with views labeled "anti-science" are very much believers in science in the abstract, they just believe that the commonly accepted science is perverted by ideological biases, political agendas and/or corporate corruption.
It's a form of anti-intellectualism: the belief that those who society considers the experts can't be trusted.
Logged
darklordoftech
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,477
United States


« Reply #4 on: September 16, 2017, 11:18:42 PM »

Most people with views labeled "anti-science" are very much believers in science in the abstract, they just believe that the commonly accepted science is perverted by ideological biases, political agendas and/or corporate corruption.
It's a form of anti-intellectualism: the belief that those who society considers the experts can't be trusted.

The belief that those who society considers the experts can't be trusted isn't anti-intellectualism; it's the basic premise behind Democracy. It requires the experts to not just decide, but also convince.
I didn't say that anti-intellectualism is always bad.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 11 queries.