Where to begin:
1) First, you start out your thread by attaching onto to the emotionalism of a very senstive topic, using it as a vehicle to attack the other side when the two points you makes have absolutly nothing in common.
2) Second, you are attacking a strawman. No one has ever claimed the possition that you are going after. Instead, you take the possition of a small minority of the electorate, assume that all of your opponents hold that possition. Then you apply it to a situation that has no direct relevance to that possition. Somehow, in this thread, you seem to have concluded that I believe this to be so.
3) You have a long history of open hostility towards the "religious right" and practicing Catholics in particular.
4) You have a long history of mischaracterizing the possitions of those who disagree with you, even if the difference is slight. It is the only weapon in your arsenal.
5) If you want to respond, from now on, PM me, or respond in the "Give a Hoot" Thread.
1) It's a valid question and a valid point...you are the one who is applying blanket emotionalism to this topic.
2) Wrong. It's really a basic belief of the fundies...you have to accept Christ to get into heaven. I don't subscribe to the belief that a perfectly good human being can rot in hell just because they didn't have a personal relationship with Jesus before they died. Maybe we agree?
3) Of course I have hostility to the religious right.
4) Well then, you have mischaracterized this situation...so we're equal.
5) I'm going to respond in this thread so everybody can read it as a reply to yours. Why are you so affraid of me responding directly to your posts?