Mew Research Center (Exit poll results part 2: Sen-Prez Crosstabs) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 19, 2024, 12:21:28 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  Mew Research Center (Exit poll results part 2: Sen-Prez Crosstabs) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Mew Research Center (Exit poll results part 2: Sen-Prez Crosstabs)  (Read 2237 times)
Kitteh
drj101
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,436
United States


« on: February 18, 2013, 02:08:57 AM »
« edited: February 19, 2013, 10:55:21 PM by Pope Fluttershy I »



Good evening, ladies and gentlecats, and welcome to the grand opening of Mew Research Center, Atlasia's premier institute for public opinion research. We have just finished our inaugural amazing super-awesome exit poll of the February 2013 election. My assistant will now present the results:



Thank you all for gathering here. There were 60 voters in our exit poll, a strong sample size. First off, the first-preference results:



Marokai won strongly in the first round, with Cathcon in second and Kalwejt a distant third, as in the actual vote.

Second preferences:



Marokai wins in a landslide, as in the actual vote.

In the At-Large senate race:



Adam Griffin comes out narrowly ahead, Napoleon in second and Goldwater in third.

In the final round of the senate:



Napoleon wins.

Now, onto some more interesting stuff.

The ideological breakdown confirms the obvious: Atlasia is definitely a left-leaning country:



Total left: 60%
Total center:12%
Total right:28%

In total, 60%of Atlasians describe themselves as left-of-center. It's not a coincidence that Marokai also received 60% of the vote.  This poll shows that the left-wing, center-left, and right-of-center factions all number roughly the same (30%, 30%, and 28%). This reflects the three major parties Atlasia, all of which are of similar size.  It also shows just how far the Right has to go to win. Assuming the Right holds down all centrist and right-leaning voters and takes 40% of center-left voters against a left-wing candidate, a the right-leaning candidate would still only win a narrow 52%-48% victory. 40% of center-left voters seems to be the magic number for the Right in most scenarios, but convincing 40% of center-leftists not to vote for a left-of-center candidate is a very tough job.

Party distribution:



TPP is over-represented here compared to actual registration numbers. Mew Research Center believes this is because the poll asked which party people "support or feel closest too", so evidently some people support or feel close to TPP but are not members.

The next results are hard to present in chart form, since the long wording of the options makes them hard to display. Here are the top issues cited in deciding how to vote. Responses are on a scale of 1 to 5, with 1 being not at all important and 5 being very important. Average score of answers:

Presidential:
General ideology - 3.63
Candidate personality - 3.52
Economic issues - 3.45
Candidate's past activity level - 3.44
Game reform - 3.39
Party affiliation - 3.13
Social issues - 3.10
Campaigns - 2.97
Annexation - 2.32
Dogs - 2.09

At-Large Senate:
Candidate personality - 3.93
General ideology - 3.59
Party affiliation - 3.36
Economic issues - 3.21
Candidate's past activity level - 3.05
Social issues - 2.91
Campaigns - 2.84
Game reform - 2.79
Dogs - 2.20
Annexation - 1.95

A few notes about these results:

*It's interesting that campaigns mattered very little. Most people cited things, like general ideology or personality, that are already determined before a candidate starts campaigning. It looks like most voters make up their minds very early in the campaign, rather than waiting to see how a candidate campaigns or what their proposals are.

*It's worth noting that more people cited general ideology than any particular type of issue. It seems this election did not hinge on any one issue.

Another way to look at this is by which issues were more important in the Presidential vs. Senate race. Below are the issue's importance in the Presidential race minus their importance in the Senatorial race. In green are issues that were more important in the Presidential, in red are issues that were more important in the Senatorial:

Game reform: 0.60
Candidate's past activity level: 0.39
Annexation: 0.37
Economic issues: 0.24
General ideology: 0.04
Dogs: -0.11
Campaigns: -0.13
Social issues: -0.19
Party affiliation: -0.23
Candidate personality: -0.41

These results are not surprising. Game reform was much more important in the Presidential race, where Marokai made it one of his central campaign planks, than in the Senatorial race, where it wasn't much discussed. On the other hand, personality was a much bigger issue in the Senate race, where people's highly polarized views of Napoleon where a large part of the race.

Now, favorability. First, the Presidential candidates. The first chart is their average rating on a scale of 1-5, the second is the percentage giving each rating (strongly unfavorable, somewhat unfavorable, neutral/unsure, somewhat favorable, and strongly favorable):

 



Candidates:

Marokai:
Favorable: 69%
Neutral: 15%
Unfavorable: 16%
Net favorable: +53%
Positive intensity (strongly favorable-strongly unfavorable): +24%

Cathcon:
Favorable: 65%
Neutral: 16%
Unfavorable: 21%
Net favorable: +44%
Positive intensity: +26%

Scott:
Favorable: 59%
Neutral: 21%
Unfavorable: 19%
Net favorable: +40%
Positive intensity: +22%

Kalwejt:
Favorable: 55%
Neutral: 15%
Unfavorable: 29%
Net favorable: +26%
Positive intensity: +17%

Winfield:
Favorable: 26%
Neutral: 19%
Unfavorable: 55%
Net favorable: -29%
Positive intensity: -19%

Keystone Phil:
Favorable: 24%
Neutral: 23%
Unfavorable: 53%
Net favorable: -29%
Positive intensity: -21%

The top two candidates, Marokai and Cathcon, are the most favorably viewed by Atlasians, not surprisingly. Scott and Kalwejt also are strongly liked, while Winfield and Keystone Phil are...not.

Now for the At-Large Senate candidates:





Adam Griffin:
Favorable: 68%
Neutral: 19%
Unfavorable: 13%
Net favorable: +55%
Positive intensity: +29%

Fezzyfestoon
Favorable: 66%
Neutral: 24%
Unfavorable: 11%
Net favorable: +55%
Positive intensity: +19%

Goldwater
Favorable: 51%
Neutral: 27%
Unfavorable: 22%
Net favorable: +29%
Positive intensity: +18%

Napoleon
Favorable: 50%
Neutral: 9%
Unfavorable: 42%
Net favorable: +8%
Positive intensity: -2%

What is clear from these results is that Napoleon is a very polarizing figure. He has slightly more people that like him than that don't, but people who don't like him tend to really not like him; strongly unfavorable outnumbers strongly favorable. Napoleon also has by far the lowest "Neutral/Unsure" of any candidate. No other candidate, for President or Senate, polls the same way Napoleon does. This poll shows that Napoleon was a candidate unlike any other in this election.



This concludes the first part of Mew Research Center's presentation of this exit poll. Still to come are breakdowns of the crosstabs and even more detailed analysis. Thanks to all who voted!
Logged
Kitteh
drj101
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,436
United States


« Reply #1 on: February 18, 2013, 02:48:14 AM »

This polling proves Atlasia is a racist nation.

wut
Logged
Kitteh
drj101
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,436
United States


« Reply #2 on: February 18, 2013, 01:15:03 PM »

It really speaks volumes to the quality of the Senate race that I have the lowest negatives and still got run into the ground. Well done, men. That was one of the best elections I've been a candidate in.

One thing that probably contributed to your loss is that a lot of your favorables were "somewhat  favorable". So lots of people liked you but you weren't really strongly liked by all that many. That translated into lots of 2nd and 3rd preferences but not enough 1sts.
Logged
Kitteh
drj101
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,436
United States


« Reply #3 on: February 18, 2013, 07:19:31 PM »




Dawg? This is Mew Research Center.
Logged
Kitteh
drj101
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,436
United States


« Reply #4 on: February 19, 2013, 10:54:43 PM »



Hello all, and welcome to the second part of Mew Research Center's analysis of our Amazing Super-Awesome Exit Poll.

To start things off, here's a simple chart: how people who voted for one of the "other" candidates in the first round of the presidential race voted in the second:



Overall, people who voted for "other" candidates in the first round went to Marokai 56%-44%. This chart isn't all that interesting. Here's a slightly more interesting one, a comparison of how voters voted in the presidential election and the at-large senatorial election:



The results of this are still nothing surpising. Here's the same thing for the second round of the at-large senate election:



The voters for right-leaning candidates and Scott, the liberal, went strongly for Napoleon. The voters for left-leaning candidates outnumbered them, but they were much less united behind Griffin and a significant minority of Marokai's and Kalwejt's supporters voted for Napoleon.

The left-right split in the senate race really becomes clear when you break it down by presidential second preference:


Marokai's voters went for Griffin and then Fezzy, while Cathcon's voters went for Goldwater and then Napoleon. Again, although Marokai voters are the vast majority, Napoleon was able to get a decent amount of support from them while Griffin and Fezzy got none from Cathcon's voters.

The same thing shows in the second round:



Marokai's voters went about 2-1 for Griffin over Napoleon, but among Cathcon voters Napoleon won by a more than 60 point margin.

To further demonstrate this, it helps to flip things around and compare senate votes to presidential ones. Here is how voters for each Senate candidate broke down in the second round of the Presidential election:



There's a huge polarization here: Griffin and Fezzy voters went 100% for Marokai while Goldwater voters went almost 100% for Cathcon. Napoleon is the only one with any kind of crossover support. But it is very interesting that although Napoleon is generally considered center-left, his voters went 2-1 for the center-right candidate in the Presidential election. Bear in mind these are first round voters only, so this excludes federalists who first-preferenced Goldwater and second-preferenced Napoleon.

To wrap this set up, here's one final chart, showing how voter's second-round senate vote compared to their second-round presidential vote:



This chart shows the same trends I mentioned above.



This was a lot of charts to throw at you, but combined they all one important takeaway: the coalition that elected Napoleon was from the Atlasian right. Napoleon's views are generally left-of-center and so were many of his supporters. But his voters in both rounds were definitely to the right of the Atlasian political center. Part of this might have to do with the fact that the Overton window of Atlasian politics is significantly to the left of that in America, so people who are slightly to the left of the American political center may be slightly to the right of the Atlasian political center. Regardless of why, Napoleon's voters in both rounds were definitely to the right of the average Atlasian.



As you'll see later, this is an important fact that says a lot about Atlasian politics going forward, much more than just Napoleon. More to come in the next post Wink
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.183 seconds with 10 queries.