What is your background in economics and have you ever held a position similar to this one, online or in real life?
I have never professionally modelled this type of cost estimate, but I have worked in the legislative process and currently I work on housing policy. In either case, I've developed a strong enough familiarity with the tools and economics required to create realistic cost estimates which are integral to the type of work I do. TL;DR, I'm not qualified to do this in real life, but unless Atlas has some econ PHD I don't know about, I'm the best you've got. Academically, I hold a bachelors in econ and a masters in public policy, so again, I'm very familiar with the metrics involved, and have worked alongside forecasters and used plenty of data like this to work on other projects.
Would you have any problem with accurately scoring an economically beneficial bill with which you personally disagree? Would you have any problem with accurately scoring an economically horrible bill with which you personally agree?
Not at all. I have no interest in assuming this role just to act in bad faith and I hope to earn the trust of Atlasians across the political spectrum. In most cases, the fundamental impacts of a bill on revenue, employment, and expenditures can be modeled in a clear manner and conflict arises only when determining whether the costs warrant the benefits. In these situations, my job is simply to provide you with data and it is for the legislators to draw their own conclusions. In less straightforward cases, particularly those with spillover effects that could affect business or consumer behavior, I will model a range of realistic outcomes and use a random number generator to determine which outcome actually occurs. I promise that I will do my best to be as fair and objective as one can be in this role.