Well well well. Yet another trigger issue (no pun intended) for people to debate.
Is it really getting that boring around here?
Yes. Still in an originalist interpretation, I'd have to say the Second Amendment was intended to permit private individuals to keep military grade weaponry. However, that was in an era where even military weaponry wasn't all that deadly.
True. But even the Founders saw how much military arms had changed (from bladed implements to projectile arms) and had to have known that military rifles would advance to something beyond the muzzleloaders being used then.
