Breaking: AP on Clinton emails (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 17, 2024, 04:28:22 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Breaking: AP on Clinton emails (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Breaking: AP on Clinton emails  (Read 4148 times)
DrScholl
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,264
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -3.30

« on: January 29, 2016, 03:07:29 PM »

The FBI is totally ready to indict.
Logged
DrScholl
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,264
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -3.30

« Reply #1 on: January 29, 2016, 03:30:06 PM »

Lol, more breathless misleading reporting from the virulently anti-Clinton media: https://twitter.com/danmericacnn/status/693164896070946816

That sticks a knife in the hopes of the Sanders supporters.
Logged
DrScholl
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,264
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -3.30

« Reply #2 on: January 29, 2016, 04:10:11 PM »

Did anyone consider the possibility that nothing will come of this? Every damn week we hear that an indictment is coming, yet nothing happens. Basically, the same thing gets repeated every week about the emails and there is nothing new. What exactly is new here?
Logged
DrScholl
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,264
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -3.30

« Reply #3 on: January 29, 2016, 04:16:17 PM »

Did anyone consider the possibility that nothing will come of this? Every damn week we hear that an indictment is coming, yet nothing happens. Basically, the same thing gets repeated every week about the emails and there is nothing new. What exactly is new here?

According to Politico, "It was the first time State has formally deemed any of Clinton's emails classified at that level, reserved for information that can cause "exceptionally grave" damage to to national security if disclosures."

That still doesn't sound like anything new, certainly not anything that can be used in an indictment. At this point all that is being thrown around is speculation.
Logged
DrScholl
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,264
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -3.30

« Reply #4 on: January 29, 2016, 04:21:24 PM »

Did anyone consider the possibility that nothing will come of this? Every damn week we hear that an indictment is coming, yet nothing happens. Basically, the same thing gets repeated every week about the emails and there is nothing new. What exactly is new here?

The ongoing investigation seemingly coming to a head, the number of FBI agents involved that came out (something like 130), the buzz from the White House and FBI agents speaking off the record, and the hyper secret nature of some of the emails that has now come to light, are all rather "new." Sure, it may end up being "nothing" from an indictment, or recommended indictment, standpoint, but it is a Sword of Damocles hanging over Hillary. Whether or not it drops or not, remains to be seen, but the Pubs seem to think the FBI director is free of politics, and will call it as he sees it, damn the politics, so one way or the other, it should end up, with Justice being done, and that is a good thing.

Or if push comes to shove you can go back to hoping she drops dead like that tabloid said, right?
Logged
DrScholl
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,264
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -3.30

« Reply #5 on: January 29, 2016, 04:22:08 PM »

Even if its just an aide who gets indicted its still very bad. The ads write themselves "Top Hillary Clinton indicted by FBI".

There isn't even any evidence that an aide will be indicted.
Logged
DrScholl
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,264
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -3.30

« Reply #6 on: January 29, 2016, 04:28:07 PM »

Did anyone consider the possibility that nothing will come of this? Every damn week we hear that an indictment is coming, yet nothing happens. Basically, the same thing gets repeated every week about the emails and there is nothing new. What exactly is new here?

The ongoing investigation seemingly coming to a head, the number of FBI agents involved that came out (something like 130), the buzz from the White House and FBI agents speaking off the record, and the hyper secret nature of some of the emails that has now come to light, are all rather "new." Sure, it may end up being "nothing" from an indictment, or recommended indictment, standpoint, but it is a Sword of Damocles hanging over Hillary. Whether or not it drops or not, remains to be seen, but the Pubs seem to think the FBI director is free of politics, and will call it as he sees it, damn the politics, so one way or the other, it should end up, with Justice being done, and that is a good thing.

Or if push comes to shove you can go back to hoping she drops dead like that tabloid said, right?

Now you're trolling. I never posted any such thing. I never posted that I thought she was sick. I put up a tabloid article. But then you already knew that. You are just trying to get a rise out of me - and succeeded. Congratulations.

Generally, we don't see posters on here posting tabloid articles, because this isn't a tabloid board. I was being somewhat sarcastic, but you took it really hard it seems.
Logged
DrScholl
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,264
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -3.30

« Reply #7 on: January 29, 2016, 04:30:03 PM »

The State Department seems to be trying to delay things until after the early states.

It doesn't mean they were top secret when she sent them...

That's not how classified information works. She was trained to know when content she created was classified.



This conspiracy crap is getting out of hand. Are you really going to accuse the State Department of a cover up?
Logged
DrScholl
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,264
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -3.30

« Reply #8 on: January 29, 2016, 04:43:44 PM »

The State Department seems to be trying to delay things until after the early states.

It doesn't mean they were top secret when she sent them...

That's not how classified information works. She was trained to know when content she created was classified.



This conspiracy crap is getting out of hand. Are you really going to accuse the State Department of a cover up?

The state department was supposed to release all the emails today, but they're asking for a month extension. That's the facts.

It's still a stretch to suggest the State Department is involved in a cover up.
Logged
DrScholl
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,264
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -3.30

« Reply #9 on: January 29, 2016, 05:34:23 PM »

The Berniebros and Conservahos are pathetic. Since we can call names, why not call a spade a spade?
Logged
DrScholl
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,264
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -3.30

« Reply #10 on: January 29, 2016, 05:52:55 PM »

The Berniebros and Conservahos are pathetic. Since we can call names, why not call a spade a spade?

I know it's hard to hear that your candidate of choice may have done something wrong, but you can't just project that onto other people to make the issue go away.

Oh, spare me the morality lecture. My post was in response to one poster calling Clinton a bitch and the notion that the State Department is involved in a cover up.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.035 seconds with 11 queries.