It seems Adams speaks more to the financial part, whereas Hamilton the educational. And, both are considered Federalist party leaders.
But again, thanks!!
Sort of. When Adams talks about "men . . . wholly destitute of Property," he's specifically talking about the landless class (land being the most common and most valuable form of property) —so it's not a question of financial standing so much as having a permanent vested interest in the community. The reasoning behind restricting the franchise to landholders is that unskilled laborers who lack a property investment are dependent on the wage market, and so may be more easily swayed by demagogues and vote buyers; whereas landholders are (theoretically) self-sufficient, and so will come to a disinterested, independent judgement.