Are breed based "dangerous dog laws" EVER a good idea? (user search)

Talk Elections Forum Contact | US Election Atlas Election 2024 Election Results Election Info Atlas Wiki

	Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email? May 16, 2024, 06:25:59 AM

News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

Talk Elections

General Politics

Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)

Are breed based "dangerous dog laws" EVER a good idea? (search mode)

Pages: [1]

Poll

Question:

Are breed based "dangerous dog laws" EVER a good idea?

#1 yes (D)		2 (7.4%)
#2 no (D)		5 (18.5%)
#3 yes (R)		3 (11.1%)
#4 no (R)		4 (14.8%)
#5 yes (I)		7 (25.9%)
#6 no (I)		6 (22.2%)

Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 27

Author

Topic: Are breed based "dangerous dog laws" EVER a good idea? (Read 1845 times)

Pheurton Skeurto
20RP12
Atlas Superstar

Posts: 38,438

Political Matrix
E: -5.29, S: -7.13

Re: Are breed based "dangerous dog laws" EVER a good idea?

« on: March 24, 2012, 10:19:01 AM »

Yeah, it's basically "racist" if that's the term we're using.

We don't have laws that label particular human races as dangerous, because that would cause mass public hysteria, so why have laws that label certain dogs as dangerous?

Logged