Please explain the 1st debate "bounce" to me (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 30, 2024, 04:36:22 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  Please explain the 1st debate "bounce" to me (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Please explain the 1st debate "bounce" to me  (Read 4054 times)
HagridOfTheDeep
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,758
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -4.35

« on: November 24, 2012, 04:15:58 PM »

If the election was held three days after that first debate, Romney probably would have won. I do think it was real.

Still, Romney needed to win the second debate to keep things going. I predicted that if there was a decisive winner in the second debate, that candidate would win the election. To me, the second debate wasn't as much of a draw as people though—Obama had a big win.

My script for Romney's second debate was always something like this:

[Woman asks a question about the economy.]

MITT: You know, thanks for that question. Sorry if this is strange to say, but when I first saw you sitting there, you reminded me of my mother. The way you carry yourself, the way you talk, the concerns you have for this country... I understand that women out there are really struggling. And you bring up an issue which my mother was so passionate about. I thank you for your question. (etc.)



A win in a townhall debate was exactly what Romney needed. If he'd gone positive and engaged with the audience instead of with Obama, I bet he'd be the President-Elect right now.

Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 11 queries.