Yes. Three key points to keep in mind:
(1) the 1st Amendment does not apply to you if you're not a citizen of the United States;
(2) the 1st Amendment does not give you the right to destroy public property (and for those who might be confused, police vehicles are public property);
(3) the 1st Amendment does not give you the right to assault those with whom you disagree;
Actually, the Supreme Court has said that the 1st Amendment does not distinguish between citizens and non-citizens. While non-citizens certainly do not have all of the rights of US citizens, fundamental ones including the 1st Amendment still apply, as they should. What kind of country would this be if foreign journalists, students, academics, etc. were not granted the same freedom of thought and expression as anyone else?
A very good point. As a result, my first bullet point should be revised to read as follows:
(1) the 1st Amendment
does not apply to you if you are in the United States illegally;
Because assuming you are referring to
Bridges v. Wixon, 326 U.S. 135, 148, Justice Frank Murphy, in his concurring opinion, states that "once an alien
lawfully enters and resides in this country he becomes invested with the rights guaranteed by the Constitution to all people within our borders. Such rights include those protected by the First and the Fifth Amendments …"
The emboldening is mine. Clearly, the court distinguishes between those individuals who have entered the country lawfully, and those who are here unlawfully. The protections of the first and fifth amendments extend to those here
legally, not everyone.