SB 2018-316: Dual Officeholding Act (Tabled) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 17, 2024, 09:27:59 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  SB 2018-316: Dual Officeholding Act (Tabled) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: SB 2018-316: Dual Officeholding Act (Tabled)  (Read 2452 times)
Sestak
jk2020
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,284
Ukraine


« on: October 13, 2018, 10:16:55 PM »

For the sake of moving along debate, I will sponsor fhtagn's amendment. Sponsor?
Logged
Sestak
jk2020
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,284
Ukraine


« Reply #1 on: November 08, 2018, 11:46:48 AM »

Worth noting that the sponsor is required to give feedback on the amendment before this can go forward.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Seeing as this amendment was sponsored by a sitting Senator, the final vote can't proceed until Canis provides feedback, and the above conditions have been met regarding this.

Pretty sure we've just gone to votes before after prolonged periods of nonresponse from sponsors.

Anyway I move to suspend and consider this amendment vote legitimate, 24 hours to object.
Logged
Sestak
jk2020
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,284
Ukraine


« Reply #2 on: November 12, 2018, 01:17:15 AM »

oof. Reintroducing the amendment. Please PM in future (on Atlas).
Logged
Sestak
jk2020
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,284
Ukraine


« Reply #3 on: November 19, 2018, 02:35:45 PM »

Actually, screw it, move to table.
Logged
Sestak
jk2020
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,284
Ukraine


« Reply #4 on: November 23, 2018, 03:29:15 PM »

Aye.
Logged
Sestak
jk2020
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,284
Ukraine


« Reply #5 on: November 24, 2018, 01:35:15 PM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.



Yes, Al Gore eat your heart out. The tabling vote is invalid because the motion was not seconded by a Senator.


I think this was being considered the second.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 11 queries.