SB 105-14: Financial Transaction Tax Act (Passed) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 14, 2024, 07:24:36 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  SB 105-14: Financial Transaction Tax Act (Passed) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: SB 105-14: Financial Transaction Tax Act (Passed)  (Read 2062 times)
AGA
Atlas Politician
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,281
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -5.39

P P
« on: October 12, 2021, 11:12:58 AM »

This tax was an utter failure in Sweden and would bring the stock market down substantially. I strongly oppose this.
Logged
AGA
Atlas Politician
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,281
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -5.39

P P
« Reply #1 on: October 12, 2021, 07:26:21 PM »
« Edited: October 12, 2021, 08:41:32 PM by AGA »

This bill would eliminate high-frequency trading, which plays an important role in helping stocks reach their most efficient market price. This would also lower the value of people's retirement accounts if they are invested in stocks, and the exemption in section IV creates a tax cliff that could cause people to avoid getting a raise in certain rare situations. How would section IV even be implemented if this isn't an income tax?
Logged
AGA
Atlas Politician
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,281
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -5.39

P P
« Reply #2 on: October 12, 2021, 08:40:50 PM »

Senator WD has shown that most stocks are held by wealthy individuals, not that most people who own stock are wealthy. Considering that most Atlasian adults have own shares of some kind, it doesn't seem possible for the latter to be true. This bill would affect anyone with a retirement account that holds any of the financial instruments targeted by the bill, even if they don't pay the tax directly.

I am not against the idea of Section IV; I am just unsure of how it would be implemented. A much easier way to relieve the tax burden on the middle-class would be to make the first $X in transactions exempt from the tax. This would eliminate both the need for reporting income to a broker and the tax cliff. Therefore, I offer this amendment.

Quote
Section IV. Exemptions

The provisions of this act shall not apply to the first $10,000 worth of covered transactions made by an individual in any given year.individuals who’s income for the taxable year is $60,000 or less.

Section IV.V. Effective Date

The provisions of this act shall apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2021.
Logged
AGA
Atlas Politician
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,281
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -5.39

P P
« Reply #3 on: October 21, 2021, 04:07:56 PM »

Nay
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 11 queries.