SB 2017-111: Antineutrino-Simossad Affordable Housing Act of 2017 (Passed) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 16, 2024, 01:19:57 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  SB 2017-111: Antineutrino-Simossad Affordable Housing Act of 2017 (Passed) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: SB 2017-111: Antineutrino-Simossad Affordable Housing Act of 2017 (Passed)  (Read 4037 times)
Wikipedia delenda est
HenryWallaceVP
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,243
« on: August 15, 2017, 11:37:18 PM »
« edited: August 16, 2017, 07:51:21 AM by Fremont Senator Henry Wallace »

Making housing affordable is a noble goal, and this bill looks like it would be an effective mean of achieving that end. Rent controls are a promising system that should succeed in making housing more affordable, as should a distributive program whose purpose is to fill vacant homes. I do concur with several of my other colleagues, though, that the "empty and abandoned homes" heading for Section 4 needs a clear definition. For the reasons outlined above, I support this act.
Logged
Wikipedia delenda est
HenryWallaceVP
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,243
« Reply #1 on: September 12, 2017, 06:28:03 PM »

I'll sponsor it.
Logged
Wikipedia delenda est
HenryWallaceVP
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,243
« Reply #2 on: September 17, 2017, 09:45:50 AM »

Senator PiT's amendment is friendly.
Logged
Wikipedia delenda est
HenryWallaceVP
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,243
« Reply #3 on: October 02, 2017, 06:38:28 PM »
« Edited: October 02, 2017, 08:02:38 PM by Fremont Senator Henry Wallace »

I am unsure about this amendment. In some ways, it reminds me of California Proposition 187, an awful policy which denied services to undocumented immigrants in California. However, it may actually be standard operating procedure to only allow legal aliens to be involved in housing distributive programs; I simply don't know enough about housing policy. I feel that it would be beneficial for the Senate to vote on this amendment. That is why I have decided that Senator Spiral's amendment is unfriendly.
Logged
Wikipedia delenda est
HenryWallaceVP
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,243
« Reply #4 on: October 04, 2017, 07:43:22 AM »

After thinking about this for awhile and after seeing the arguments made by other Senators, I have decided to vote NAY.
Logged
Wikipedia delenda est
HenryWallaceVP
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,243
« Reply #5 on: October 09, 2017, 05:54:45 PM »

Aye
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 11 queries.