KEmperor
Junior Chimp
Posts: 8,454
Political Matrix
E: 8.00, S: -0.05
|
 |
« on: December 05, 2005, 08:47:25 PM » |
|
Regarding the first book, I clicked on your link and read the reviews. One of them made a very obvious point if you think about it:
"if crustal displacements DO happen as frequently as the author suggests, then, do to latitude change of certain locations, any star aligments to dates like 10500 BC or 15000 BC are completely invalid. If crustal displacement theory is correct, then these star aligments are not. Two of Hancock's longest-running central themes are mutually incompatible right from the start. "
|
