What is your opinion of changing employment numbers ex post facto? We are meant to hold the GM's words as fact. Are the GM's most recent words the "most recent" facts, even if they contradict something previously? How do we treat any such contradiction?
Well I think we may have had some clerical errors in the past, I will go over the numbers and make sure the appropriate figures are presented. And yes, my statements and numbers are to be considered fact- HOWEVER, I am going to be open to fixing mistakes if one is made here or there. If one of my numbers doesn't add up or if I refer to Iraq President Saddaam Hussein, just send me a personal message telling me what the error or potential error is and I will make sure the record is accurate. In an instance of said contradictions, you can PM me and I will either determine myself to be right or wrong and what stands is fact.
Could you say a bit more about how you would treat statements by previous GMs?
