If no states used commissions, what maps would we see? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 02, 2024, 06:43:22 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  If no states used commissions, what maps would we see? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: If no states used commissions, what maps would we see?  (Read 573 times)
President Punxsutawney Phil
TimTurner
Atlas Politician
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,897
United States


« on: February 27, 2022, 11:10:20 PM »

California would probably be different.
Logged
President Punxsutawney Phil
TimTurner
Atlas Politician
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,897
United States


« Reply #1 on: February 28, 2022, 10:02:05 PM »

California, Colorado, and New Jersey would be dem manders each with two republicans

NJ isn't too far off from what a Dem gerrymander would be. It was a purposeful decision to weaken Malinowski to shore up Sherill and Gottheimer. And Malinowski's seat is still Biden +4.

There used to be dreams of drawing out Van Drew, but I doubt a Democrat will be elected there for a long time.


What would an actual Gerrymander look like?
I assume two GOP sinks - one in Northern Jersey, one in South. Or two in South, none in North. Perhaps three - 2 south, 1 north. In all cases, the rest of the seats would at least be Lean D.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.017 seconds with 8 queries.