So, what you all are saying is that an anti-fracking candidate could use that stance as a way to cozy up to the coal voters too?
I doubt that would work well either because West Virginia stands to directly benefit from fracking:
Another problem you're going to have with that argument is that the coal industry already feels as though environmental restrictions are killing them, so they would likely see anti-fracking positions as a repeat of the same policy ideas extended to another energy source and identify with the pro-fracking side.
I'd hope that those WV Coal Companies would have some money invested in WV Fracking as well.
But we kind of assume that industries/corporations don't seek Government action to go after competitors too.
There's been a war on coal for decades, it's been waged by alternatives in the free market.
I'd hope some people are at least thinking of other industries that can be put in those areas, instead of having an area where people either work in coal or don't work at all. Granted, there's been kind of a few decades long impasse on the issues of doing things to help rural economies and the sort of economies in Coal Country.