Which revisionist theory is worse? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 03, 2024, 10:50:04 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Which revisionist theory is worse? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Well?
#1
Bill Clinton was the only Democrat who could have won in 1992/Bill Clinton realigned the map
 
#2
Donald Trump was the only Republican who could have won in 2016
 
#3
They're both equally bad
 
#4
Other
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 70

Author Topic: Which revisionist theory is worse?  (Read 3431 times)
Arbitrage1980
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 770
« on: January 22, 2017, 05:25:31 PM »

Clinton 1992 was a re-alignment, although that was not the consensus at the time. He won by running as a charismatic moderate southern democrat who eschewed the stagnant urban liberalism of his party while rejecting the harsher elements of Reaganism. But the re-alignment occurred because of his relatively successful presidency on the domestic front, mainly the sharp reduction of crime and strong economic growth. This was critical because it won over college-educated suburban whites who used to vote GOP at the presidential level. Also, the GOP's rightward shift on social and cultural issues alienated new england, mid-atlantic, upper midwest, and the west coast.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 13 queries.