Lol whites are not voting for Clinton ARRRRGGG.
You know SC whites are different to NH and IA whites don't you? I don't expect Clinton to win whites in the end, but it won't be the blow-out it was in those contests.
Chuck Todd trying to do envelope math and starting by giving Sanders the same % of whites in SC and NH is amusingly stupid.
Plus, there's gonna be a chunk of voters that are going to end up voting in the R primary on 2/20 and unable to vote in the D Primary on 2/27.
LOL, is Chuck Todd really that much of a fat moron? If you're going to operate under ridiculous assumptions, then it would be a much better one to split them the same way as IA, not Bernie's quasi home state.
He probably is.. but here's the tweets that inspired my comments on him..
"A little back of the envelope math for SC Dem primary: if Sanders wins 61% of white vote (as he did in NH) he needs 43% of black vote to win
Will have a lot more on the math to focus on in both races on tomorrow's @meetthepress
In the last NBC/WSJ/Marist SC poll, Clinton led Sanders among blacks 74-17... he has a lot of work to do."
Guys like Chuck Todd are in the business of creating horseraces. It's more exciting that way. Todd probably has his MTP job until Luke Russert gets seasoned enough to that that job.
Todd's the guy that bitched all night during IA that "Hillary declared too victory too early" or some BS like that.
What exactly is you guys' problem with what he said. He didn't say, or assume, that Sanders would get certain demographic numbers. He said "if this, then this." Is he wrong or not about
that statement. If he's not, you have no basis for such harsh (and probably ignorant) criticism.
