The Economist endorsed Aécio Neves. No surprises.
In the USA, The Economist has already endorsed republican and democratic candidates. In the UK, The Economist has already endorsed conservative and labour candidates. In Italy, The Economist has already been against Berlusconi. Outside these three countries, this newspaper had always endorsed the candidates of the Right.
This is not the case, and not just in Australia but also Canada.
Yeah, they endorsed Labor in 2001 in Australia as well. And they've endorsed Congress in India, the Kemalists in Turkey and a few others.
It's to be excepted that they tend to endorse left of center parties more often in the Anglosphere because the ideological average tends to be more to the right relatively to most of the other countries - surely relatively to South America (although they rarely endorse in non-Anglo countries). Plus, they have a strong bias against incumbent governments that are perceived as sleazy in the management of public resources or corruption prone and (fairly or unfairly) that's the case of Dilma's government - it's central to their endorsement editorial.