Should there be a revote? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 16, 2024, 12:32:54 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Gubernatorial/State Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Should there be a revote? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Where should there be/should there have been a revote?
#1
Washington Governor 2004 yes, Florida 2000, no
 
#2
Washington Governor 2004 no, Florida 2000, yes
 
#3
Both yes
 
#4
Both no
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 59

Author Topic: Should there be a revote?  (Read 15338 times)
Will F.D. People
bgrieser
Rookie
**
Posts: 78


« on: January 04, 2005, 10:45:08 AM »

Possibilty number 4; they abstained.

What type of ballots are being used?

One thing that the abstention theory does not account for is why in King County there are 1782 more votes in the tally than there are people who voted.

For the case in favor of a recount:

http://www.soundpolitics.com/archives/cat_2004_governors_race.html

Also:

http://www.revotewa.com/index.htm

Even if you are willing to excuse the numbers simply not adding up, there is the case of the military ballots where the ballots did not reach the servicemen and women in time and they were only allowed to vote for President and no other race. I call on Democrats everywhere to join me in protesting this blatant disenfranchisement of a segment of the population.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.029 seconds with 14 queries.