New Tradesports rankings
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 06, 2024, 01:38:01 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2008 Elections
  New Tradesports rankings
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 10 11 12 13 14 [15] 16 17 18 19 20 ... 66
Author Topic: New Tradesports rankings  (Read 183448 times)
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #350 on: May 01, 2007, 08:45:06 AM »


Congress "authorization" was not really a declaration of war so much as it was a decision that we believe there is reason to suspect that war might become necessary and as such, we will give the authority to our president to make that decision based on the facts at the time, without having to deal with an emergency resolution that might not occur in a timely manner.


In theory, that is true. However, I think that all the legislators knew prior to the vote, that, in practice, they were voting on whether to go to war with Iraq (unless they're all incredibly naive). I personally believe that Clinton's vote was politically motivated because the case for going to war was popular at the time.
Well, obviously.

Which is actually a very worrying indicator regarding her political instincts - it didn't take a genius, not really, to figure out that "yea" would eventually come to be viewed as the wrong vote on that.
Logged
Swing low, sweet chariot. Comin' for to carry me home.
jmfcst
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,212
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #351 on: May 01, 2007, 11:35:09 PM »

And Fred Thompson now seems to be tanking.  Any guesses as to why that is?  Are people starting to wonder if he'll actually get in the race?

Volatility due to thin trading
Logged
I spent the winter writing songs about getting better
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 113,120
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #352 on: May 02, 2007, 01:24:19 AM »

So if tommorow Thompson came out and said he's not running, who'd gain the most?
Logged
Reignman
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,236


Political Matrix
E: -3.23, S: -3.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #353 on: May 02, 2007, 02:05:45 PM »

So if tommorow Thompson came out and said he's not running, who'd gain the most?

Probably Romney and Gingrich?
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,777


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #354 on: May 02, 2007, 02:48:58 PM »

Edwards and Kerry gain, Biden loses.

Thompson, Hagel gain, Gingrich loses.


Democrats
Clinton 47.0
Obama 31.0
Gore 10.4
Edwards 8.2
Richardson 2.4
Biden 0.6
Clark 0.5
Dodd 0.4
Kerry 0.3
Warner 0.2


Republicans
Giuliani 31.8
McCain 20.1
Thompson 15.3
Romney 15.2
Hagel 3.2
Gingrich 2.9
Huckabee 2.4
Bloomberg 1.2
Rice 1.2
T. Thompson 0.9
Brownback 0.6
Cheney 0.4
Tancredo 0.3
J. Bush 0.3
Paul 0.2
Powell 0.2
Hunter 0.1
Logged
Boris
boris78
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,098
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: -1.55, S: -4.52

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #355 on: May 02, 2007, 06:10:54 PM »

So if tommorow Thompson came out and said he's not running, who'd gain the most?

The Democratic Party
Logged
The Duke
JohnD.Ford
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,270


Political Matrix
E: 0.13, S: -1.23

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #356 on: May 02, 2007, 11:52:18 PM »

So if tommorow Thompson came out and said he's not running, who'd gain the most?

Giuliani.  He's the one whose numbers fall the most when Fred is included in a poll.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,777


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #357 on: May 05, 2007, 06:01:12 PM »

Lieberman and Gravel, LOL
Thompson is getting stale, but there's still a large gap between him and 5th place


Democrats
Clinton 47.1
Obama 31.0
Gore 10.1
Edwards 8.1
Richardson 2.6
Biden 0.5
Clark 0.5
Dodd 0.3
Warner 0.2
Kerry 0.1
Lieberman 0.1
Gravel 0.1


Republicans
Giuliani 30.8
McCain 21.5
Romney 17.1
Thompson 15.1
Hagel 2.8
Gingrich 2.8
Huckabee 2.1
Bloomberg 1.2
Rice 1.2
T. Thompson 0.9
Brownback 0.6
Cheney 0.4
Paul 0.4
J. Bush 0.4
Tancredo 0.3
Powell 0.2
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,546
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #358 on: May 08, 2007, 02:28:06 AM »

Thompson bombed in his first major speech since the Presidential talk got serious. I think my original idea that his candidacy was a complete joke may not have been far off.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,777


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #359 on: May 08, 2007, 03:11:13 AM »

Not much change.
The Lieberman and Gravel joke bids disappear.
Giuliani, Huckabee, and Paul have slight gains at Bloomberg's and others expenses.


Democrats
Clinton 47.2
Obama 30.6
Gore 10.6
Edwards 8.1
Richardson 2.5
Biden 0.6
Clark 0.5
Dodd 0.4
Warner 0.2
Kerry 0.2


Republicans
Giuliani 31.9
McCain 21.5
Romney 17.1
Thompson 15.1
Hagel 3.0
Gingrich 2.7
Huckabee 2.4
Rice 1.2
Bloomberg 0.9
T. Thompson 0.8
Paul 0.7
Brownback 0.5
Cheney 0.4
J. Bush 0.3
Tancredo 0.3
Powell 0.2
Hunter 0.1
Logged
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,066
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #360 on: May 08, 2007, 12:55:18 PM »

McCain has now jumped all the way up to 25.0, which is the highest level he's been at in something like two months.  And Gore has now jumped all the way to 11.0 in the "winning individual" category, which means that he's now rated as having a better chance of winning the presidency than winning the Dem. nomination (Huh).
Logged
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,066
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #361 on: May 08, 2007, 06:14:23 PM »

McCain is surging like mad, while Giuliani tumbles.  Current numbers:

Giuliani 28.3
McCain 27.4

Odds to go all the way and win the general election:

Clinton 26.6
Obama 21.3
Giuliani 16.5
McCain 16.0
Logged
Verily
Cuivienen
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,663


Political Matrix
E: 1.81, S: -6.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #362 on: May 08, 2007, 06:37:14 PM »

McCain has now jumped all the way up to 25.0, which is the highest level he's been at in something like two months.  And Gore has now jumped all the way to 11.0 in the "winning individual" category, which means that he's now rated as having a better chance of winning the presidency than winning the Dem. nomination (Huh).


Clearly Al Gore has hidden ambitions to seek the Republican nomination.
Logged
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,066
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #363 on: May 08, 2007, 09:17:33 PM »

And McCain has now reached 31.0, putting him ahead of Giuliani for the first time in many many months.  What is going on?  Did people suddenly discover McCain's early primary state poll numbers and realize that the national polls aren't everything?  Or were Giuliani's donations to Planned Parenthood the straw that broke the camel's back in terms of people's expectations re: Giuliani's ability to satisfy the conservative base of the party?
Logged
Verily
Cuivienen
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,663


Political Matrix
E: 1.81, S: -6.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #364 on: May 08, 2007, 09:18:50 PM »
« Edited: May 08, 2007, 09:21:23 PM by Verily »

And McCain has now reached 31.0, putting him ahead of Giuliani for the first time in many many months.  What is going on?  Did people suddenly discover McCain's early primary state poll numbers and realize that the national polls aren't everything?  Or were Giuliani's donations to Planned Parenthood the straw that broke the camel's back in terms of people's expectations re: Giuliani's ability to satisfy the conservative base of the party?


Or did some wealthy McCain supporter decide to buy up on McCain to make him seem a more likely nominee to the politically informed? While McCain skyrocketed, Giuliani only decliend somewhat in the same period, indicating that it was not so much a shift from Giuliani as a person or group or people jumping on the McCain bandwagon.

Now is probably a great time to make easy money by selling McCain on Intrade.
Logged
I spent the winter writing songs about getting better
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 113,120
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #365 on: May 09, 2007, 12:05:37 AM »

I'd love to open an account, but probably can't thanks to fascist piece of legislation Bill Frist snuck into the port security. It warns you that credit card transfers probably won't work. I suppose I could mail a check though, as inconvenient as that'd be (also deals with international air mail)
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #366 on: May 09, 2007, 06:40:43 AM »

Your username is a month off. I was born in December 1978.
Logged
I spent the winter writing songs about getting better
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 113,120
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #367 on: May 09, 2007, 01:19:18 PM »

One month before Aaron Weiss. Interesting.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,777


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #368 on: May 09, 2007, 02:28:23 PM »

Nothing exciting on the Democratic side.
McCain has a huge gain. Romney also gains.
Giuliani drops.

Democrats
Clinton 47.7
Obama 30.1
Gore 10.3
Edwards 7.8
Richardson 2.3
Biden 0.6
Clark 0.5
Dodd 0.3
Warner 0.2
Kerry 0.1


Republicans
Giuliani 29.9
McCain 26.0
Romney 18.1
Thompson 15.0
Hagel 2.9
Gingrich 2.7
Huckabee 2.2
Rice 1.2
Bloomberg 0.9
T. Thompson 0.8
Paul 0.7
Brownback 0.5
Cheney 0.4
J. Bush 0.3
Tancredo 0.3
Powell 0.2
Hunter 0.1
Logged
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,066
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #369 on: May 10, 2007, 02:58:20 PM »

Intrade has now added a new section for betting on the winner of both the Iowa caucus and the NH primary (for both parties).  It's brand new though, so no one has placed a bet yet.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,777


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #370 on: May 10, 2007, 03:06:37 PM »

Someone with a lot of money or something causes a Clinton surge. Seeing as no Democrat went down, I'm sure the Democrats add up to well over 100%.

It's been a good day for McCain, he gains at Giuliani's expense.
Gingrich,  Bloomberg, Paul  lose.


Democrats
Clinton 56.0
Obama 30.3
Gore 10.7
Edwards 8.2
Richardson 2.5
Clark 0.7
Biden 0.6
Dodd 0.3
Warner 0.2
Kerry 0.1


Republicans
Giuliani 28.6
McCain 27.4
Romney 18.0
Thompson 14.9
Hagel 2.8
Gingrich 2.5
Huckabee 2.2
Rice 1.1
T. Thompson 0.7
Bloomberg 0.5
Brownback 0.5
Paul 0.4
Cheney 0.4
J. Bush 0.3
Tancredo 0.2
Powell 0.2
Hunter 0.1

Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,777


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #371 on: May 12, 2007, 09:29:42 PM »

Clinton sinks to more reasonable levels.
Strangely the other top 5 Democrats also drop, the only gainer is Bayh.

On the Republican side, McCain goes up, passing Giuliani who goes down. Thompson drops a bit. Bloomberg goes up.


Democrats
Clinton 50.6
Obama 28.4
Gore 9.9
Edwards 7.7
Richardson 2.2
Clark 0.7
Biden 0.5
Dodd 0.3
Warner 0.2
Kerry 0.1
Bayh 0.1

Republicans
McCain 30.0
Giuliani 28.8
Romney 18.0
Thompson 14.0
Hagel 2.9
Gingrich 2.5
Huckabee 2.2
Bloomberg 1.2
Rice 1.1
T. Thompson 0.7
Brownback 0.5
Paul 0.5
Cheney 0.4
J. Bush 0.4
Tancredo 0.2
Powell 0.1
Hunter 0.1
Logged
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,066
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #372 on: May 13, 2007, 02:06:21 PM »

Current asking price for the IA and NH winners (yes, they add up to more than 100, as the ask and bid prices haven't converged yet):

IA
Clinton 45.0
Edwards 45.0
Obama 15.0
Gore 15.0

Giuliani 35.0
McCain 30.0
F. Thompson 25.0
Romney 20.0

NH
Clinton 65.0
Obama 20.0
Edwards 20.0
Gore 15.0

Giuliani 35.0
Romney 30.0
McCain 29.9
F. Thompson 20.0
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,777


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #373 on: May 13, 2007, 02:43:18 PM »

Obama, Clark down
Giuliani, Romney, T. Thompson down. Hagel up.

Democrats
Clinton 50.7
Obama 28.0
Gore 9.7
Edwards 7.7
Richardson 2.1
Biden 0.6
Clark 0.5
Dodd 0.3
Warner 0.2
Kerry 0.1
Bayh 0.1

Republicans
McCain 29.5
Giuliani 28.8
Romney 17.6
Thompson 14.2
Hagel 3.3
Gingrich 2.5
Huckabee 2.3
Bloomberg 1.2
Rice 1.1
Brownback 0.5
Paul 0.5
T. Thompson
Cheney 0.4
J. Bush 0.4
Tancredo 0.2
Powell 0.1
Hunter 0.1
Logged
jimrtex
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,817
Marshall Islands


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #374 on: May 14, 2007, 01:52:05 AM »

Current asking price for the IA and NH winners (yes, they add up to more than 100, as the ask and bid prices haven't converged yet):
They should add up to more than 100.  Otherwise you could buy some of each an be guaranteed to make money. 

Though they ordinarily would add to something around 105.  With a new contract, someone may be offering high ask prices on everyone, hoping that people simply want to get on the action.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 10 11 12 13 14 [15] 16 17 18 19 20 ... 66  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.046 seconds with 10 queries.