Supreme Court overturns Eighth Circuit Decision allowing minor to sue to have an abortion (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 08, 2024, 05:34:28 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  Constitution and Law (Moderator: Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.)
  Supreme Court overturns Eighth Circuit Decision allowing minor to sue to have an abortion (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Supreme Court overturns Eighth Circuit Decision allowing minor to sue to have an abortion  (Read 403 times)
NewYorkExpress
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,817
United States


« on: March 20, 2023, 03:55:15 PM »

https://www.politico.com/news/2023/03/20/jackson-dissents-in-scotus-abortion-case-00087840

Quote
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented Monday as the Supreme Court wiped out a federal appeals court ruling that upheld the right of a minor to go to court to obtain permission to seek an abortion without parental notification.

That lower court decision, issued last April by the St. Louis-based 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, seems moot as a result of the Supreme Court’s momentous Dobbs ruling last June that overturned Roe v. Wade and ended the federal constitutional right to abortion.


The high court’s order Monday directed the appeals court to vacate the judgment in the case out of Missouri and declare it moot.


The Supreme Court issued no opinion or detailed explanation for its action. However, Jackson penned a solo, four-page dissent arguing that the justices have become too liberal in granting requests from parties to nullify rulings issued by lower courts.

“This case presents absolutely no ‘extraordinary’ circumstances” justifying vacating the lower court’s decision, wrote Jackson, President Joe Biden’s only appointee on the high court.

“In my view, it is crucial that we hold the line and limit the availability of Munsingwear vacatur to truly exceptional cases,” she added, referring to a key precedent on when such action is appropriate.

Jackson emphasized that, in her view, “mere disagreement with the decision that one seeks to have vacated cannot suffice” to justify the unusual step.

No other justice recorded any objection to the high court’s action, which was announced as part of a routine set of orders issued Monday morning.

A bit surprised Ketanji Brown Jackson is the only dissenter. I would have expected at least Sotomayor to join her here.

I guess Brown Jackson's trying to be left wing's version of Alito now that she's on the court?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.018 seconds with 12 queries.