How would you have ruled in the preceding case? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 21, 2024, 11:59:10 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  Constitution and Law (Moderator: Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.)
  How would you have ruled in the preceding case? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: How would you have ruled in the preceding case?  (Read 9248 times)
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,854
United States


« on: April 03, 2013, 02:23:29 AM »
Quote from: Vice Chair SJoyce on April 01, 2013, 06:40:02 PM
With the majority, in what would probably be one of the most certain votes of my career.

National Socialist Party of America v. Village of Skokie

For the Nazis -- but expressing unambiguous hatred for everything about them.  Such is to protect non-violent protests by other organizations which might evoke nearly-universal contempt.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.022 seconds with 11 queries.